> aim - to investigate the effects of a majority opinion on individuals judgements
> sample - 123 American male students
Procedure -
> ppts were individually placed into groups with 7-9 confederates
> say which line was the same length as standard line X, ppts always second or last to answer
> 12/18 trials confederates gave identical wrong answers
> control group of 36 ppts
Aschs conformity results (2)
> On average the realppts gave a wrong answer 37% of the time when a confederate was present
> Post experimentinterviews found that the majority of ppts conformed publicly not privately to avoid ridicule
> Supporting NSI
Group size
> conformity rates increase as the size of a majority group increases. However, the size of the group stops having an effect on conformity once the group reaches a certain size
1 confederate and 1 ppt - 3%
2 confederates and 1 ppt - 13%
3 confederates and 1 ppt 32%
conformity plateaus after this
Unanimity
> complete agreement from a group of people about an answer or a viewpoint
Original study - all the same wrong answer - 37%
1 confederate give correct answer - 5.5%
1 confederate gave different wrong answer - 9%
> Dissenter breaks groups unanimous position and conformity decreases
Task difficulty
> Conformity increases when the difficulty of a task increases
Made lines more similar - conformity increased
> Suggesting ISI plays a greater role as when task becomes harder conformity rates increase
> As the right answer becomes less obvious we lose confidence in our own ability and are more likely to conform
AO3
:) RTS Lucas et al
> easy and hard maths problems
:( Lucas found more complexity then Asch suggested
> ppts with high confidence conformed less then those with low confidence