Government seeks to control media content (in both new and traditional media) to control public opinion
Authoritarian regimes
North Korea
Eritrea
Authoritarian regimes
No independent traditional media sources
People shown stories about leaders' virtues through state-owned media
Authoritarian regimes
Government prohibits access to new media
In North Korea, online access is exceedingly rare and limited to sites whose content have been chosen and modified by the government
Not all authoritarian regimes seek total domination of the media, as they want to improve their image on the international stage and economic cooperation with other countries
Repression 2.0
Direct censorship and intimidation, including imprisonment of critical journalists
Repression 2.0
President Putin imposing 'power vertical' on the press in Russia, leading to propaganda and oppressive climate for journalists
Dozens of media companies shut down and journalists imprisoned in Turkey under pretext of 'fight against terrorism'
Masked political control
Systematic efforts to hide repressive actions against the media by portraying them as upholding democratic principles
Technology capture
Using digital technologies to stop internal dissent by monitoring, surveilling, blocking websites, and using state-sponsored trolling
Two-thirds of the world's internet users live in countries which blocked or restricted access to social media sites and communication services in 2016
Self-censorship by journalists
Avoiding criticism of regimes due to fear of harassment or financial considerations
Self-censorship
Governments in Malawi and Cambodia threatening to withdraw state advertising from independent media outlets to pressure them
Democratic regimes
Greater respect for media rights and freedoms, accepting a free market in media content to a point
Laws in democratic regimes
Restrict media's freedom to report anything they choose in any way they like
Laws in democratic regimes
UK's Official Secrets Acts making it a criminal offence to report without authorization any official government activity defined as an 'official secret'
Regulatory organizations in democratic regimes
Partly or largely government-funded to regulate media activities, with power to issue or refuse licenses to media companies
Regulatory organizations
Ofcom in the UK, Press Complaint Commission
Governments in democratic regimes
Use official press conferences, briefings, and off-the-record informal briefings to manage media reporting and present official positions
Spin doctors in democratic regimes
Used to divert public attention and manipulate media content, such as by burying bad news or distracting with sensational stories
Media organization
Largely controlled by TNCs operating on a global scale or media conglomerates
Media conglomerates
YouTube (subsidiary of Google, owned by Alphabet)
Time Warner (owns Warner Bros film studio and international chain of cinemas)
Vertical integration
Owners (more than the government) have control over the content of media at each stage of its production and distribution
Media conglomerates
Murdoch family (owns News Corp, 21st Century Fox, newspapers, book/magazine publishers, film/TV companies)
Horizontal integration
Media conglomerates owned by powerful groups of individuals
Marxist approach
Owners, especially media moguls, directly control media content and manipulate it to protect their profits and spread the dominant ideology
Curran and Seaton (2010) found evidence that media owners interfered and manipulated newspaper contents
Rupert Murdoch admitted to exercising editorial control on major issues in the newspapers he owned
The Leveson Inquiry uncovered links between media owners and governments, with media support given to political parties in return for favourable policies
Marxist view
In modern capitalist societies, the state rarely requires direct control of media, as it can usually be trusted to do the right things
Neo-Marxist view
Editors and journalists have the real power to shape media content, although owners have indirect influence
Media managers, editors and journalists support dominant ideology by choice, not by force, as they have been socialized in the capitalist value system
Agenda setting
Media professionals bring forward or keep into background issues which they think will benefit them and the capitalist system
Gatekeeping
Media professionals may refuse to cover some issues which may harm their companies or their owners
Pluralist view
Audiences, especially in democratic states, have the real power to control media content
Media content is shaped through the process of making profit and increasing audience figures
Postmodernist view
The media cannot be subject to controls that restrict the flow of ideas and information, as power is no longer concentrated within institutions but within social networks
Content of media reflects the interpretation of people, and all knowledge is ideological
The state's relationship with media becomes one of managing something that cannot be safely and simply controlled as it perhaps once was