4. The working memory model

Cards (12)

  • Baddley and Hitch (1974) -

    - Developed the working memory model
  • The working memory model - AO1
    - A representation of the STM. It suggests that STM is a dynamic processor of different types of information using subunits co-ordinated by a central decision-making role.
  • Central executive - AO1
    - Supervisory role
    - Monitors Incoming data
    - Focuses and divides our limited attention and allocates 'slave systems to tasks
    - Limited capacity
    - Does not store information
  • Phonological loop - AO1
    - First Slave system
    - Deals with auditory information
    - Coding - acoustic
    - Preserves the order in which information arrives
    - Capacity - 2 seconds worth what you can say
  • Phonological loop subdivided into - AO1
    1- Phonological store - words we hear
    2- Articulatory process - allows maintenance rehearsal
  • Visuo-Spatical Sketchpad - AO1
    - Second slave system
    - Stores visual and spatial information
    - Baddley (2003) - Limited capacity of 3 to 4 items
  • Visuospatial sketchpad subdivided into - AO1
    - Robert Logie (1995) - subdivided this store into
    1- Visual cashe - stores visual data
    2- Inner scribe - record the arrangement of objects in the visual field
  • Episodic buffer - AO1
    - Third slave system
    - Added by Baddley in 2000
    - Bring together materials from the other sub-systems into a single memory
    - To achieve a time-sequencing
    - Produces a single memory which all the verbal, spatial and visual information from the other slave systems
    - Links the working memory to the LTM
    - Baddley (2012) - Limited capacity of 4 chunks
  • Clinical evidence 😊 - AO3
    - Shallice and Warrington( 1970) - case study on patient KF
    - brain injury
    - He had poor STM ability for auditory sounds but could process visual information just fine
    - Recall of letters and digits was better when he read them (visual) than when they were read to him (auditory)
    - His phonological loop was damaged, but his VSS was intact
  • CP to clinical evidence 🙁- AO3
    - It is unclear whether KF had any other cognitive impairments
    - Which might have impacted his performance on memory tasks
    - Injury was caused by a motorcycle accident
    - Trauma involved may have affected his cognitive performance apart from his brain injury
  • Dual-task performance 😊- AO3
    - Baddley (1975) - participants carried out visual and verbal tasks at the same time - dual tasks
    - Performance was similar to when tasks were carried out separately
    - But when they were asked to perform both visual tasks performance declined substantially
    - Both Visual tasks were competing for the same slave system - VSS
    - There is no competition when we're performing separate visual and verbal tasks
    Separate slave systems for visual (VSS) and verbal (PL)
  • Nature of the central executive - 😊
    - Lack of clarity over the nature of the central executive
    - Baddley (2003) - recognised this when he said thet the central executive was the most important but the least understood component of the working memory
    - Some psychologists consist of separate components
    - An unsatisfactory component and challenged the integrity of WMM