Save
murder
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Rumaisa Hussain
Visit profile
Cards (15)
Actus reus of murder
The
unlawful
killing of a
reasonable
creature
under the king's peace
Unlawful killing
1.
Act
2.
Omission
Unlawful killing by
omission
R v
Pittwood
- defendant guilty of gross negligence manslaughter for
failing
to close a
gate
Reasonable creature
The death must be of a
reasonable
creature of being, not a
foetus
(
Attorney
general
reference
1994)
The victim must have
brain
functioning
at the time of the incident (
Malcharek
)
Under the king's
peace
The
murder
shouldn't be committed at a time of
war
Mens rea
of
murder
Malice aforethought
Express
malice
Intention
to
kill
Implied malice
Intention
to cause
GBH
Direct
intent
It's the defendant's
aim
,
purpose,
or
desire
to bring about the result (
Mohan
)
Indirect intent
It's
virtually
certain
and the defendant knows this (
Woolins
)
Intention to inflict
GBH
which results in the death of the victim is enough for the mens rea of murder (
Vickers
)
Causation
1.
Factual
causation (but for test)
2.
Legal
causation (operative and substantive cause)
Factual causation
Paggett
- but for the defendant using his girlfriend as a human
shield
, she wouldn't have
died
New
intervening
acts
that may break the
chain
of
causation
Act of
God
Act of a
3rd
party
The
victim's
own act
Acts that don't break the chain of causation
Smith
- dropping the victim didn't break the chain as the wound was the
operative
and
substantive
cause
Cheshire
-
medical
negligence
rarely breaks the chain
Jordon
- medical treatment rarely
breaks
the chain of causation unless its
palpably
wrong