Agreeing with the group externally but keeping personal opinions, a temporary change in behavior
Identification
Behaving according to group membership, private values change only when with the group
Internalization
Personal opinions genuinely change to match the group, a permanent change
Informational social influence (ISI)
Looking to the majority for guidance on how to behave correctly, results in internalization
Normative social influence (NSI)
Wanting to appear normal and be approved by the majority, results in compliance
Asch (1951) found 32% of participants conformed to the incorrect responses of the group
Jenness (1932) found individuals' second private guesses moved closer to the group's guess, providing evidence for ISI
Variables affecting conformity
Group size (conformity increases with more confederates)
Presence of a dissenting voice (conformity drops if one confederate gives the correct response)
Task difficulty (conformity increases on more difficult tasks)
Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment found participants quickly conformed to their assigned social roles as prisoners and guards
Agentic state
The individual believes they don't have responsibility for their behavior as they are just following orders from an authority figure
Legitimacy of authority
Individuals accept that those higher up in the social hierarchy should be obeyed
Milgram (1963) found 65% of participants were willing to deliver the maximum 450 volt shock when instructed by an authority figure
Situational variables affecting obedience
Proximity to victim (obedience drops when teacher has to physically touch the learner)
Location (obedience increases in a more legitimate setting)
Uniform of authority figure (obedience drops without the uniform)
Adorno argued that individuals with high levels of authoritarianism were more likely to obey in Milgram's study
Resistance to social influence
Social support (seeing others resist)
Locus of control (internal locus of control correlates with greater resistance)
Minority influence
Minorities attempt to change majority opinion through informational social influence, a slow process that can speed up through the snowball effect
Factors enabling minority influence
Consistency (repeating the same message over time)
Flexibility (appearing open-minded)
Commitment (being willing to suffer for their views)
Social change often occurs through a snowball effect as the minority view becomes more acceptable and the majority slowly converts
Minorities are more influential when they are part of the in-group rather than an out-group
Governments can drive social change quickly by changing and enforcing laws due to their legitimacy of authority
Social influence
A type of conformity where an individual's behaviour or beliefs are influenced by real or imagined group pressure
Compliance
Going along with others in public, but privately not changing personal opinions and/or behaviours - a superficial change
Identification
The individual adopts the behaviours or beliefs of a group because there is something they value
Internalisation
When a person genuinely accepts the group norms, resulting in private and public change of beliefs - this is usually permanent
Asch's study showed a significant degree of conformity, with about 75% of participants conforming at least once, 5% conforming every time, and the overall conformity rate in the critical trials being 32%
Asch's results support normative social influence, as participants conformed for social approval and to avoid rejection or being seen as an outcast
Factors affecting conformity in Asch's study
Group size - conformity increased with larger groups
Unanimity - conformity decreased when there was a dissenter in the group
Task difficulty - more ambiguous tasks increased conformity
Informational social influence
The need to be correct, driven by the belief that others have more knowledge or correct information, leading to internalisation and permanent change
Normative social influence
Driven by the desire to be liked, leading to compliance and superficial, temporary change
Asch's experiment involved groups of 1-10 male college students, with one actual participant and the rest confederates
Zimbardo's experiment investigated if prisoner aggression was created by situational or dispositional factors
In Zimbardo's experiment, all participants conformed to social roles quickly, with prisoners and guards conforming within 2 days, and the experiment being terminated due to prisoner mental health concerns
Obedience
A form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order, usually influenced by an authoritarian figure
After the Holocaust, Milgram decided to research why Hitler's orders had been followed by the German people
Agentic state
The idea that an individual believes they don't have responsibility for their behaviour as they are acting on behalf of an authority figure
Legitimacy of authority
The idea that individuals accept that other individuals who are higher up in the social hierarchy should be obeyed
Milgram's study supports the agentic state, as participants went along with harming the learner because the experimenter took responsibility