A sociological perspective that views education as performing important functions for society
Durkheim's view of the functions of education
Social solidarity: Ensures individuals have norms and values to function in society
Society in the miniature: School prepares students for wider society
Skills for work: Teaches skills needed for modern society
Role and punishment: Rewards good behaviour and sanctions bad behaviour
Parsons' view of the functions of education
Bridge analogy: School acts as a bridge between home and wider society
Meritocracy: Belief that students get what they deserve based on abilities and efforts
Role allocation: Students are put into jobs best suited to their abilities
Criticism of the functionalist view: Assumes norms and values taught in school are the same as in society, and that qualifications always lead to the best jobs
Marxism
A sociological perspective that views education as reproducing and legitimising social inequalities
Bowles and Gintis' correspondence principle
Education mirrors the workplace: Obedience to authority, Extrinsic rewards
Myth of meritocracy: Belief that hard work leads to success, used to stop questioning the system
Criticism of Marxist view: Willis' study showed not all pupils are brainwashed into being passive
Feminist perspectives on education
Gendered subject choices: Resources in science/maths appeal more to boys
Textbooks and stereotyping: Hidden curriculum teaches patriarchal values
Domination of space: Boys dominate the classroom and get more attention
Double standards: Boys get away with more than girls
Criticism of feminist view: Francis and Skelton argue females may adopt empowering male traits, and Moirs argues school has become too girl-friendly
Labelling
Teachers interact with students based on an 'ideal pupil' stereotype, leading to self-fulfilling prophecies
Becker's labelling theory
Middle/upper class students more likely to fit 'ideal pupil' stereotype and be labelled positively
Rosenthal and Jacobson's study
Spurters: Average ability students labelled as high ability made significant progress
Criticism of labelling: Fuller found a group of black girls who persevered and proved their teachers wrong
Banding and setting
Students' behaviour and performance changes based on the band/set they are placed in
Criticism of banding and setting: Lower streams can be motivating and lead to a self-negating prophecy
Anti-school subculture
Working class students who reject school values and focus on getting a job instead
Hargreaves' anti-school subculture
Underachievers, often working class, form an anti-school subculture due to status frustration
Willis' anti-school subculture
Working class boys who see through meritocracy and want to get a job instead of focusing on academics
Criticism of anti-school subculture: Some pupils are somewhere in between anti and pro-school
Material deprivation
Lack of access to resources and opportunities due to socioeconomic status
Examples of material deprivation
Inability to afford textbooks, uniforms, school trips
Poor living conditions affecting performance
Not eating during the school day affecting focus
Inability to afford leadership opportunities
Cultural deprivation
Lack of cultural capital and values aligned with the education system
Bernstein's language code theory
Working class have a more restricted language code, putting them at a disadvantage
Sugarman's attitudes and orientations
Fatalism, immediate gratification, present time orientation, collectivism
Social capital
Connections and networks that provide advantages
Criticism of external factors: Not all working class parents lack interest, some groups overcome disadvantages, and it ignores what happens in the classroom
Ethnocentric curriculum
Curriculum that focuses only on white history and achievements, ignoring other cultures
Criticism of ethnocentric curriculum: Chinese and Indians do better than white and African-Caribbeans even though their culture is not covered
Institutional racism
Racism built into the structure of the education system
Criticism of institutional racism: Chinese and Indians do better than white and Afro-Caribbeans even though they also face institutional racism
Material factors
Socioeconomic disadvantages faced by inferior groups
Criticism of material factors: Chinese and Indians on free school meals perform better than all other groups on free school meals
Cultural factors
Cultural differences and values that affect educational attainment
Language as a cultural factor
South Asian children speaking multiple languages may be confusing when learning English
Criticism of language barrier: Bangladeshis have been improving and are generally above white pupils, with white working class on free meals being the lowest achieving
Parental values and aspirations as a cultural factor
Working class ethnic parents lack skills/knowledge to make informed school choices, unlike middle class parents
Criticism of parental values: Indian families' high expectations positively affect their children's results, and Afro-Caribbean families send their children to Saturday school due to worries about underachievement
Emphasis on coursework
Boys suffer from low self-esteem and poor motivation, while girls are more willing to do coursework
Laddish subculture
Boys rejecting academic work to appear 'cool' and popular
Criticism of laddish subculture: Girls can also form a laddish subculture and prioritise appearance over studies