what are the weaknesses of the localisation to function theory?
- LASHLEY'S RATS = removed areas (10-50%) of cortex in rats learning a maze, no area proven more important in ability to learn maze (learning require every part of cortex) = suggests higher cog. funtions (eg. learning) not localised, but distributed hollistically as too complex + require whole brain involvement
- ISSUE OF PLASTICITY = when brain damaged + particular function compromised/lost, brain can reorginise itself to recover lost function (law of equipotentiality) (eg. stroke patients recovering lost abilities) = contradicts localisation theory, as compensation of diff. parts suggests same funtion can occur in diff. parts of brain (more hollistic)
- ISSUE OF FREE WILL = scans of psychopath criminals, have low levels of activity in orbital cortex (central), which regulates emotions, morality, aggression. study of ppl w/ antisocial personality disorder had average 18% reduction in vol. of middle frontal gyrus = localisation theory suggests don't have free will to change behaviour (issues of punishment + blame) as other areas of brain can't compensate for lower activity