diagnosed with motor neurone disease 1999, died in 2002. found it hard to communicate and if nobody understood she screamed
pragmatic - is euthanasia practical? it helps to free her from the suffering
therefore, its positivist to euthanise - most loving thing as it prevents her suffering
puts her needs first
ignores rules about euthanasia
nigel cox example
lillian suffered intense arthritic pain, 5 days before death she asked dr cox to end her life and he did and he was tried for murder. sons agreed the dr did the best thing
pragmatic, it works to put her out of her pain and suffering
obviously ignored rules
positivist - agapeic to stop suffering
personalism - put her needs before the hospital
case of jim
45 with a terminal disease, life expectancy of 8 months and will be in great pain
is his choice pragmatic? influenced by family? or suffering from depression which may change
how correct is the diagnosis
has his choice to die been approved?
if yes, relief from demoralising pain is sufficient reason
fletcher - relief from demoralising pain is sufficient, sacredness of personality.
fletcher - 'to prolong life uselessly is to attack the moral status of the person'