An information processing model of memory created by Atkinson and Shiffrin in 1968
Multi-store model of memory
It is a linear model - information passes through it in one direction and has to go through each stage in order
It is a passive model - the stores simply hold information before passing it on or forgetting it
Stores in the multi-store model
Sensory memory
Short-term memory (STM)
Long-term memory (LTM)
Coding
The format that information is held in
Capacity
How much information a store can hold
Duration
How long information is held in a store
Information flow in the multi-store model
1. Received from environment by senses
2. Enters sensory memory
3. Attention paid to information
4. Moves to short-term memory
5. Rehearsal to transfer to long-term memory
Sensory memory
Modality specific - codes by sense organ
Huge capacity
Very short duration (0.25 seconds)
Short-term memory (STM)
Acoustically coded
Capacity of 7 +/- 2 items
Duration of 18-30 seconds without rehearsal
Long-term memory (LTM)
Semantically coded
Potentially unlimited capacity
Potentially unlimited duration
Maintenance rehearsal
Keeping information in STM while needed
Elaborative rehearsal
Linking new information to existing knowledge in LTM to transfer it
The multi-store model is a relatively simple model of memory
Research supporting the multi-store model
Glanzer and Cunitz's primacy-recency effect
Baddeley's acoustic vs semantic similarity studies
Jacobs' study on STM capacity
Peterson and Peterson's study on STM duration
There is less research on the capacity and duration of LTM as it is difficult to test
Artificial, unnatural tasks used in research
Lack of ecological validity - findings may not apply to real-world memory use
Artificial, unnatural tasks used in research
Lack of mundane realism - participants may not be motivated like in real life
The multi-store model is overly simplistic and does not fully capture the complexity of human memory
The concept of rehearsal in the multi-store model is oversimplified
Semantic memory
Memory for facts and meanings, can be put into words
Episodic memory
Memory for personal experiences and events, can be put into words
Procedural memory
Memory for skills and actions, cannot be easily put into words
Types of long-term memory
Semantic
Episodic
Procedural
Semantic and episodic memories are declarative (can be put into words), procedural memory is non-declarative (cannot be easily put into words)
Recalling semantic and episodic memories
Requires conscious effort
Recalling procedural memories
Happens reflexively, without conscious effort
Procedural memories
Highly resistant to forgetting
Almost impossible to forget
Episodic memories
Somewhat easy to forget, especially if not emotionally important
Semantic memories
More resistant to forgetting than episodic, but can still be forgotten
Episodic memories are first coded in the prefrontal cortex and stored across the brain connected by the hippocampus
Semantic memories are associated with the parahippocampal cortex and the temporal lobe
Procedural memories involve the motor cortex and the cerebellum
Case study of Clive Wearing
After brain damage, he retained semantic memories (knew he was married) but lost episodic memories (couldn't remember his wedding day), and retained procedural memories (could still play the piano)
Amnesiac patients can improve on procedural skills like touch typing, but don't remember the episode or semantic memory associated with the skill
Case studies and brain imaging research support the idea of distinct types of long-term memory
There is some debate about whether the three types of long-term memory are truly distinct, as episodic and semantic memories are both declarative, and procedural memories may be connected to semantic memories