Made by selling products at a price higher than the cost price
When volume increases
Fixed cost per unit decreases
Lower selling price
Leads to even higher volume
Higher volume
Leads to increased profits
Price elasticity of demand
Measures the change in demand in response to a change in price
Perfectly elastic demand
Infinite change in demand with change in price
Perfectly inelastic demand
No change in demand, whatever the price
Negative price elasticity to demand
Decreased prices lead to increased demand
Product A
For a fall in price, the corresponding rise in demand is bigger. Hence it is elastic.
Product B
For a fall in price, the rise in demand is smaller, hence it is inelastic.
Even though the price fall between P1, P2, P3 and P4 is equal
The effect on demand keeps increasing
Elastic demand
PED>1, change in demand > change in price, Total revenue increases when price reduced and vice versa
Inelastic demand
PED<1, change in demand < change in price, Total revenue decreases when price reduced and vice versa
Elasticity differs at different points of prices
When price elasticity is high (i.e. more than 1) and cost inflation is higher than price inflation, putting up prices in line with costs will cause a disproportionately large reduction in demand, and total revenues will decline
In times of inflation it is better to put up prices frequently by a small amount each time, as customers do not appear to notice the increases – or certainly do not react to them
If prices are held and then substantially increased in a single price rise, demand is likely to fall off sharply
The same product of different companies in the market have different price elasticities due to market conditions, hence elasticity has to be looked at with reference to competitor's reactions too, apart from just the effect on demand
If price is increased from P1 to PA and competitors do not follow suit, the demand will fall away sharply, since consumers will have the option of substitutes
In practice few organisations attempt to set prices by calculating demand and elasticity. This is probably because it is exceptionally hard to determine demand under different circumstances with any certainty
Most organisations will have some idea of the elasticity of their products and this will have some bearing on the way prices are set
Factors affecting demand
Scopeof market
Informationin market
Availability ofsubstitutes
Complementaryproducts
Disposableincome
Necessities
Habititems
Perfect competition
Buyer is pricetaker
Noentry/ exitbarrier
Perfectinformation
Companies aim tomaximiseprofit
Homogenousproducts
Imperfect competition
Monopoly: only one seller
Monopolistic competition: Limitedproducers, similar but non identical products
Oligopoly: Fewcompanies dominate the market and areinter-dependent
Profit maximisation model
1. Profit is maximised when marginal cost = marginal revenue
2. It is worthwhile a firm producing and selling further units where the increase in revenue gained from the sale of the next unit exceeds the cost of making it (i.e. the marginal revenue exceeds the marginal cost)
3. If the cost of the next unit outweighs the revenue that could be earned from it (i.e. the marginal cost exceeds the marginal revenue), production would not be worthwhile
4. A firm should therefore produce units up to the point where the marginal revenue equals the marginal cost: MR = MC
Algebraic approach to profit maximisation
Set the price equation
2. Double b to get MR= a+2bx
3. Establish MC, which is variable cost per unit
4. Equate MR and MC to find Q
5. Substitute Q in price equation to find P
6. It may be necessary to find maximum profit
Tabular approach to profit maximisation
Fill in the table with details like units sold, selling price, variable cost, fixed cost
2. Choose the quantity and price with the maximum profit
Limitations of pricing models
Demand not alwayscalculatable
Objective is achieving target profit, rather than theoretical max. profit
Finding marginal cost not easy
Often, quantity determines cost
There are a lot of other factors effecting demand
Total cost plus pricing
Adding a markup to the total cost, more used by government contractors
Advantages of total cost plus pricing
Requiredprofitwill be made if budgeted sales achieved
2. Useful for contract costing
3. If cost structures are known, cost plus model is simple and cheap
4. Useful in justifying price to customers
Problems with total cost plus pricing
There may be variation in apportionment of fixed costs, hence varied prices
2. Costs are apportioned on basis of normal volume, then if lower actual volume achieved, fixed costs are not recovered
3. No account of competitor activity
4. No flexibility in different stages of product life cycle
Marginal cost plus pricing
Adding markup to marginal cost. Higher markup needs to be added to recover fixed costs and profit both.
Advantages of marginal cost plus pricing
In bad market conditions, markup can be reduced to not cover fixed costs
2. Useful for pricing one off contracts by only considering relevant costs
3. Contribution per limiting resource can be maximised
Problems with marginal cost plus pricing
Companies in a competitive market may reduce their margins below their total cost to gain market share. Companies may keep lowering their prices until one is forced out of business and then it is difficult for the other company to raise back prices.
Premium pricing
Pricing above competitors permanently to position product as superior
Market skimming
Keeping high prices initially so that only keen customers buy it. Then prices are lowered. Again customers keen to buy it come in and then prices are lowered again. This maximises revenue.
Penetration pricing
Pricing products very low (below total cost) temporarily to gain market share and create entry barriers
Price differentiation
Market is split into different segments and each segment is charged different prices. Segments can be on the basis of time, quantity, function, type of customer, location, etc
Loss leader pricing
Setting low price for main product and charging high for add ons or extras
Discount pricing
Products priced lower than market norms but presented as being of same quality. Posing a low cost, high volume and low margins model.