validity - a research instrument is considered valid if it measures what it supposed to measure
types of validity:
face validity
content validity
concurrent validity
construct validity
predictive validity
face validity - also known as "logical validity". It calls for an initiative judgement of the instrument as it "appear". Just by looking at the instrument, the researcher decides if it is valid.
content validity - meets the objectives of the study. It is done by checking the statement of questions if this elicits the needed information. Experts in the field of interest can also provide specific elements that should be measured by the instrument
construct validity - it refers to the validity of instruments as it corresponds to the theoretical construct of the study. It is concerning if a specific measure relates to other measures.
concurrent validity - when the instrument can predict results similar to those similar to those similar tests already validated, it has concurrent validity.
predictive validity - when the instrument is able to produce results similar to those similar tests that will be employed in the future. This is particularly useful for the aptitude test.
reliability - refers to the consistency of the measures or results of the instruments
types of reliability:
test-retest reliability
equivalent forms reliability
internal consistency reliability
test-retest reliability - it is achieved by giving the same test to the same group of respondents twice. The consistency of the two scores will be checked.
equivalent forms reliability - it is established by administering two identical tests except for wordings to the same group of respondents
internal consistency reliability - it determines how well the items measure the same construct. It is reasonable that when a respondent gets a high score in one item, he will also get one in similar items.
Three ways to measure the internal consistency reliability