Rightful use of power in accordance with pre-set criteria/widely-held agreements
E.g. govt's right to rule following an election
Direct democracy
All individuals express their opinions themselves, not through representatives acting on their behalf
E.g. referendums
Representative democracy
Individuals select a person and/or political party to act on their behalf & exercise political choice
Pluralist democracy
Government makes decisions resulting from the discussion of various ideas/arguments made by competing groups/organisations
Democratic deficit
Flaw in the democratic process where decisions are taken by people who lack legitimacy: not appointed with sufficient democratic input or subject to accountability
Participation crisis
Situation where a large proportion of the population doesn't engage with the political process by choosing not to vote/become members of political parties/stand for public office
Franchise/suffrage
Ability/right to vote in public elections
Think tank
Body of experts brought together to collectively focus on a certain topic: investigate & offer solutions to political/economic/social issues
E.g. Adam Smith Institute, Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Lobbyist
Paid by a client to try to influence the govt/MPs/peers to act in their client's interests
Features of direct democracy:
Peaceful transition of power
Free/fair elections
Widespread participation
Freedom of expression/association
Protection of rights/liberties
Rule of law
A constitution
Features of representative democracy:
Frequent/free/fair elections
Rules determining which citizens can vote
Method of communication between citizens & representatives
Communication through the press
Citizens can impact the political process
Social/constituency/party representation
Advantages of direct democracy:
Decisions are more legitimate if the public is consulted
The people must take responsibility for the result of decisions
People will be more open to following laws they voted on
People will be knowledgable about the political system/issues they are voting on
Encourages participation
Disadvantages of direct democracy:
Impractical for large populations/modern societies
Low turnout severely impacts legitimacy
Some issues are too complex to reduce to a 'yes'/'no' question
If a question combines 2 separate ideas voters can't choose one without the other so undermines the will of the people
Wealthier groups can spend more so have greater influence
Advantages of representative democracy:
More practical
Decisions are made by individuals who are educated on the issue
Representatives are more likely to vote for unpopular but necessary legislation
Avoids tyranny of the majority as representatives should consider minority groups
Disadvantages of representative democracy:
Representatives may not always represent the public's views
Party loyalty greatly influences representatives' votes
The public may become apathetic so decisions are left to a wealthy elite
FPTP disadvantages minority parties so views go unrepresented
Similarities between direct & representative democracy:
People are asked for their views
The legislature represents the view of the people
Use of public consultations, referendums, petitions etc.
Existence of pressure groups
Differences between direct & representative democracy:
People make decisions (direct), decisions are made for them (representative)
Greater risk of tyranny of the majority (direct)
More likely to result in a rational decisions (representative), based on heightened emotions (direct)
Able to handle complex & technical political issues (representative), unable e.g. AV vote, Scottish referendum (direct)
Delegate theory of representation
MPs should act on the wishes of their constituents
Trustee/Burkean theory of representation
MPs should consider their constituents' views but exercise their own judgement & act in the national (not local) interest
Party/mandate theory of representation:
MPs owe their position to their party & its manifesto so should vote in line with that manifesto
Evidence that the UK is not democratic:
England's vote often outweighs that of the devolved nations
Public Order Act means protests are more strictly controlled
Conservative leadership contests: 1% of the country chose Truss, 202 MPs chose Sunak
MPs don't have to follow wishes of constituents e.g. Brexit
FPTP means minority vote is lost e.g. UKIP in 2015
Polarisation: few high-profile centrist politicians
Not everyone can vote e.g. prisoners
Ways UK democracy could be improved:
More referendums
Involving the public in focus groups
E-democracy: online voting, petitions
Lowering the voting age to 16
Recall elections
Primary elections
Compulsory voting
Evidence that the UK is experiencing a participation crisis:
Decline in turnout since WWII (59% in 2001)
Increased apathy -> rise in populism/anti-establishment figures
Decrease in partymembership since the '50s (except under Corbyn)
2019 Audit of Political Engagement: 18% felt political involvement didn't change the way the UK is run at all (record high)
53% hadn't done any online political activity in the past year
'Digital divide': those without computer/internet access can't participate in digital democracy
Evidence that the UK is not experiencing a participation crisis:
Recent increase in turnout: 67% in 2019, 68% in 2017
Differential turnout: average doesn't give a good indication overall
'Aggregate Turnout is Mismeasured' (2018 academic paper): turnout might be up to 9% higher because of errors in calculation
People are increasingly turning to e-democracy e.g. 38 Degrees, social media campaigns
Voter apathy
People do not vote because they are uninterested in politics
Voter 'hapathy'
People are not motivated to vote because they are largely content with the state of politics
Partisan dealignment
Voters no longer strongly identify with a party & their support changes from election to election
Arguments for compulsory voting:
Low turnout undermines legitimacy
Those not voting are often minorities so decisions favour the wealthy
People don't have to make a choice (can spoil their ballot)
People will be more likely to read up on their choice of candidates
Arguments against compulsory voting:
Removes the incentive for politicians to engage with the public
If people vote randomly this still undermineslegitimacy
Voting is a civic right not a civic duty
Not voting is a way of registering dissatisfaction e.g. low turnout for police & crime commissioners
Arguments for lowering the voting age to 16:
Young people are more informed due to curriculum reforms
Most LEAs already hold Youth Parliament elections
Turnout for 16/17-year-olds was 75% in IndyRef
16/17-year-olds can vote in Scotland & Wales for devolved assemblies: undemocratic that this doesn't apply to England/NI
Arguments against lowering the voting age to 16:
Most 16/17-year-olds don't pay tax: don't have the same 'stake'
Turnout for 18-24 -year-olds is the lowest
People this age have very limited life experience: might be more easily swayed by social media
Voting age of 18 is the political norm: not necessarily a popular change
Key moments in extending the franchise:
Great Reform Act (1832): voting rights expanded to property owners
Representation of the People Act (1918): abolished property requirements for men & gave women >30 who met property requirements the vote
Representation of the People Act (1928): men/women could vote at 21
Representation of the People Act (1969): lowered voting age to 18
Key moments of the suffrage movement:
1897: National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies formed
1903: Women's Social and Political Union (AKA Suffragettes) meets for the first time
1910: 'Black Friday' - Suffragette demonstration outside Parliament met with violence
1912-14: Suffragette bombing/arson campaign
1913: Cat & Mouse Act (those on hunger strike in prison could be released to recover then recalled)
1914-18: WWI - Suffragettes halt militant activities for the war effort
1918: Representation of the People Act
1928: Representation of the People Act
Fawcett Society aims:
Equal pay
More equal representation in Parliament/on councils
Tackling gender stereotypes
Ensuring women aren't disproportionately impacted by COVID e.g. unpaid care work
Fawcett Society methods:
Encouraging businesses/organisations to make pledges
Petitions
Reports on aspects of gender inequality
Fundraisers
Fawcett Society successes:
Lobbied for Equal Pay Act (1970)
Lobbied for Sex Discrimination Act (1975)
Encouraged the Conservatives to extend gender pay gap reporting to different ethnicities (2017) through a report on the issue
Functions of pressure groups:
Representation
Participation
Education
Scrutiny/accountability
Insider pressure groups
Regularly consult with the govt
Core insiders
Work closely with the govt on a range of issues
Peripheral insiders
Participate as insiders but have very little influence