a flaw in reasoning or a flawed structure that undermines the validity of an argument. A fallacious argument can make productive conversation impossible.
Logical Fallacy
Logical fallacies are often used by politicians and the media to fool people because they have the deceptive appearance of being reasonable.
Also known as Name-Calling or attacking the person
This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.
Ad Hominem
A technique of persuasion that attempts to influence opinion through deliberate distortions, as in suppressing information, overemphasizing selected facts, manipulating statistics, and quoting rigged or questionable research.
Card Stacking
Is a vague word or phrase that's used to evoke positive feelings rather than to convey information.
Glittering Generalities
Uses its own conclusion as one of its stated or unstated premises. Instead of offering proof, it simply asserts the conclusion in another form, thereby inviting the listener to accept it as settled when, in fact, it has not been settled.
Circular Argument
Occurs when an argument presents two options and ignores, either purposefully or out of ignorance, other alternatives.
Gives the impression that the two opposite options are mutually exclusive and that at least one of them is true, that is, they represent all of the possible options.
False Dichotomy
Comparing one thing to another that is really not related, in order to make one thing look more or less desirable than it really is.
Faulty Comparison
Observed when the answer does not address the question. It may also happen when one changes the subject to draw away attention from the main issue.
Red Herring
This fallacy makes assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate.
Hasty Generalization
Also known as stereotyping.
It is frequently applied to group behavior in assuming that the behavior displayed by some is indicative or unique to that entire group when it is actually common to many groups. A small incidence is mistaken for a larger trend.
Overgeneralization
Occurs when someone makes a claim about a series of events that would lead to one major event, usually a bad event.
Slippery Slope
This is the presentation of an idea or conclusion that does not follow logically based upon the evidence.
Non-sequitor
This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase “post hoc, ergo propter hoc”, which translates “after this, therefore because of this”
Remember, correlation does not equal causation.
Post-Hoc
This happens when a statement of someone who is not an expert in the field in question is being used in an argument.
False Authority
Is a phenomenon where a person is reluctant to abandon or let go of a course of action because of the monetary, physical, or emotional investment done, despite knowing that continuing the course of action is bringing more damage than good.
SunkCostFallacy
One attempts to defend oneself or another from criticism by turning the critique back against the accuser. The accuser is guilty of the same, or a similar, wrong that is irrelevant to the truth of the original charge.
Tu Quoque
Goes in the opposite direction from the Appeal to Novelty fallacy by arguing that the when something is old, then this somehow enhances the value or truth of the proposition in question.
Appeal to Tradition
Attempts to persuade using emotion—specifically, sympathy—rather than evidence. Playing on the pity that someone feels for an individual or group can certainly affect what that person thinks about the group; this is a highly effective, and so quite common, fallacy.
Appeal to Pity
This simply ignores a person’s actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated and misinterpreted version of that position.
Straw Man Argument
evidences supported by records
Fact
law inclined, social construct; based on morality & ethics
Convention
debatable, an idea based on fact yet to be proven true/not
Opinion
lowest form; doesn't account other variables-limited by what someone sides to
Preference
claims that they dominate people's choice
Bandwagon
inferred ideas
Implicit
directly stated (expose)
Explicit
writer's point/position
central argument (thesis statement)
Claims
3 parts of position paper
claim
supporting details
conclusion
easily verified by statistics, research & general truths
Claim of Fact
can be verified subjectively through observation, social norms, culture, and morality
Claim of Value
elicits action
Claim of Policy
process of forming reasons by providing several supports/details