s1. criminal attempts act 1981 if with intent to commit an offence, a person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence, he is guilty of attempting to commit an offence
r v white
attempted offence where person fails to complete the intended offence
actus reus
more than merely preparatory
ags ref no1 1993
d need not have performed the last act
guellefer 1987
d must embark on the crime proper to be guilty of attempt
geddes- 2 part test
has d actually tried to commit the offence in question
has d moved from planning/preparation to implementation?
has d done an act showing he was trying to commit the full offence?
campbell
actions must be more than merely preparatory
jones
must be sufficient evidence for jury to question if d guilty of attempt
mens rea
intent to commit the offence
easom
d must have intention to commit offence
R v Millard and Vernon
Recklessness is not sufficient for an attempt
mens rea - attempted murder
p must prove an intent to kill (intent to cause gbh isn't enough for a murder conviction)
whybrow
must be intent to kill for attempted murder
walker and hayles
attempted murder can be committed with the mr of oblique intent to kill (woollin)
impossibility
criminalattempts act 1981
a person may be guilty of attempting to commit an offence even though the facts are such that the commission of the offence is impossible
legal impossibility
what d is trying to commit is not an offence known to law
r v taaffe
irrelevant whether or not d thought they were committing a crime
factual impossiblity
what d attempts is an offence known to law, but the circumstances surrounding the attempt make it impossible to commit
shivpuri
D can be guilty of an offence even if it would be factually or legally impossible
r v jones
they will be convicted under s1(2) even if impossible to commit crime