Save
END OF YEAR- LAW
Diminished Responsibility
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Macy Greenwood
Visit profile
Cards (6)
Definition
DR is a
partial
defence to
murder
defined in
s.2 homocide act 1957.
Amended by the
coroners
and
justice act s.2 2009
Key element 1
Is there an
abnormality
in
mental functioning
?
So different from that of an
ordinary
person that a
reasonable
human being would term it
abnormal
(
Bryne
)
Key element 2
Did it arise from a
recognised medical condition
*
Physical
+
Psychological
e.g.
depression
,
aspergers
,
paranoia
*Medical evidence will be decisive (
Brennan
)
*Excludes developmental
immaturity
and
voluntary
intoxication (
Dowds
)
Key element 3
Does it
substantially impair
Ds
mental
ability
One must be
substantially
impaired
a)To understand the
nature
of Ds conduct
b)To form a
rational
judgement
c)To
exercise
self control
The jury apply their
common
sense
to the meaning of "
substantial
"
Key element 4
Does it explain the
killing
*Causes Ds
conduct
or is a
significant
factor
DR & Intoxication
*
Intoxication
alone cannot support defence to
diminished
responsibility
(
Dowds
)
*Alcohol
dependancy
syndrome may support, e.g if alcoholism has lead to
brain
damage (
Wood
)
*When D is drunk + suffering pre-existing abnormal mental functioning jury must ignore voluntary drinking