Examines how people affect one another, and looks at the power of the situation
Social psychologists are interested in all aspects of personality and social interaction, exploring the influence of interpersonal and group relationships on human behavior
Social psychology studies
Intrapersonal topics (emotions, attitudes, self, social cognition)
Interpersonal topics (helping behavior, aggression, prejudice, attraction, group processes)
Situationism
The view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediateenvironment and surroundings
Dispositionism
The view that our behavior is determined by internal factors (personality traits, temperament)
Modern approaches to social psychology take both the situation and the individual into account when studying human behavior
Fundamental attribution error
The tendency to overemphasize internal factors as explanations for the behavior of others, and underestimate the power of the situation
Fundamental attribution error example
Explaining someone's angry behavior as due to their personality rather than a stressful situation they are in
The fundamental attribution error is more common in individualistic cultures that focus on the individual, compared to collectivistic cultures that focus on the group
Actor-observer bias
The tendency to attribute our own behavior to situational factors, but attribute others' behavior to internal factors
Self-serving bias
The tendency to explain our successes as due to internal characteristics, but explain our failures as due to external factors
Self-serving bias serves to protect self-esteem
Self-serving biases
Attributions that enable us to see ourselves in a favorable light (e.g. making internal attributions for success and external attributions for failures)
When you do well at a task, it is in your best interest to make a dispositional attribution for your behavior ("I'm smart") instead of a situational one ("The exam was easy")
Self-serving bias
The tendency to explain our successes as due to dispositional (internal) characteristics, but to explain our failures as due to situational (external) factors
This bias serves to protect self-esteem
When our favorite sports team wins
We make internal, stable, and controllable attributions (e.g. our team is talented, consistently works hard, uses effective strategies)
When our favorite sports team loses
We make external, unstable, and uncontrollable attributions (e.g. the other team has more experienced players, the referees were unfair, the cold weather affected our team's performance)
Just-world hypothesis
The belief that people get the outcomes they deserve
The just-world hypothesis allows us to feel that the world is predictable and that we have some control over our life outcomes
A negative consequence of the just-world hypothesis is people's tendency to blame poor individuals for their plight
Blaming poor people for their poverty ignores situational factors that impact them, such as high unemployment rates, recession, poor educational opportunities, and the familial cycle of poverty
People who hold just-world beliefs have negative attitudes toward people who are unemployed and people living with AIDS
In the United States and other countries, victims of sexual assault may find themselves blamed for their abuse
Attitude
Our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object
Components of attitude
Affective (feelings)
Behavioral (effect on behavior)
Cognitive (belief and knowledge)
Our attitudes and beliefs are influenced by both external and internal forces
Cognitive dissonance
Psychological discomfort arising from holding two or more inconsistent attitudes, behaviors, or cognitions
Experiencing cognitive dissonance
Motivated to decrease it because it is psychologically, physically, and mentally uncomfortable
Ways to reduce cognitive dissonance
Changing discrepant behavior (e.g. stop smoking)
Changing cognitions through rationalization or denial
Adding a new cognition
Initiation
A difficult process of joining a group that influences us to like the group more
Justification of effort
We value goals and achievements that we put a lot of effort into
Persuasion
The process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication
Yale attitude change approach
Features of the source, content of the message, and characteristics of the audience influence persuasiveness
Elaboration likelihood model
Describes two routes of persuasion: central (logic-driven) and peripheral (association-driven)
Foot-in-the-door technique
Getting a person to agree to a small favor or purchase, then later requesting a larger favor or purchase
The foot-in-the-door technique was demonstrated in a study where participants who agreed to post a small sign were more likely to agree to put a large sign in their yard
Principle of consistency
Our past behavior often directs our future behavior, and we have a desire to maintain consistency once we have committed to a behavior
Conformity
The change in a person's behavior to go along with the group, even if they do not agree with the group
Asch effect
The influence of the group majority on an individual's judgment