belief that human behaviour can be explained by breaking it down into smallercomponents to better understand it
what do reductionists say? (AO1 INTRO)
the best way to understand behaviour is to look closely at the very simplest parts that makeup our systems
then use the simplest explanations to understand how they work
what is holism? (AO1 INTRO)
explanations should take a wider perspective
should consider the interactions between individuals, for example
behaviourist approach - reductionist (AO1)
behaviour is a result of past learning, as behaviourists suggest
the relationship between stimuli and responses is the basis for how we behave
this is a reductionist view as complex behaviour is reduced to simple stimulus and response
skinner - reductionist (AO3)
giving a child a reward will result in behaviour being repeated
giving a punishment will result in behaviour being stopped
skinner tested this by rewarding food pellets to the rat every time it pulled the lever (desired behaviour)
as a result, the rat’s behaviour was repeated
skinner - reductionist - counter (AO3)
some behaviours may be too complex to understood by a purely reductionist approach
e.g. learning to speak may be influenced by reward and punishment, but it is also likely to be influenced by other factors (like upbringing, having siblings, etc)
biological - reductionist (AO1)
psychological problems can be treated like a disease
they are often treatable with drugs
identifying the source of someone’s mental illness as an imbalance of chemicals in the brain, for example, is reductionist
aggression / beeman - reductionist (AO1)
can be explained by hormones (i.e. testosterone), brain areas, and evolution
Beeman investigated aggression levels by castrating mice and found that it had reduced aggressive behaviour
by injecting them with testosterone later on, their aggression was reestablished
therefore the biological approach may be deemed as reductionist as behaviour is broken down to simple biological causes
biological - reductionist - counter (AO3)
reductionist approach only tells us the biological cause of behaviour
it doesn’t tell us how it feels to have a mental disorder or why someone develops a phobia
e.g. just because a part of the brain associated with fear is active while listening to certain pieces of music, doesn’t mean you are scared of it
therefore the reductionist approach may not be entirely valid
cognitive - holistic (AO1)
although it recognises underlying biological causes of behaviour, it is more concerned with developing workable models of behaviour that can be applied to the way information is processed
WMM - holistic (AO3)
memory models have become more holistic over time
WMM was built on the foundations of the MSM and it explains memory as a complex system
it involves combining previously stored knowledge with new incoming information in the forms of visual/spatial/auditory/etc
memory would not be explained fully by a reductionist model which simply looks for brain structures where different types of memory is stored
WMM - holistic - counter (AO3)
can still be reductionist
humans are reduced to processors of information
machine reductionism - the belief that humans functions are the result of ‘units’ of activity in processing systems (e.g. memory stores)