Save
ECONOMICS
THEME 3
BUSINESS GROWTH
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
A
Visit profile
Cards (31)
Firm growth
Reasons why some firms tend to remain
small
and why others
grow
Reasons for firm growth
Make more
money
Gain
monopoly
power
Greater
security
Firm grows
Experiences
economies
of scale,
decreases
costs of production, sells more goods, makes
more
revenue, makes larger
profit
Larger firm
Holds greater
market
share, can influence
prices
, restrict
ability
of other firms to enter market, have
monopsony
power to reduce
costs
Larger firm
Has more
security
, can build up
assets
and cash, sells a bigger range of goods in more markets, less affected by
changes
Not all firms grow, some remain
small
due to
constraints:
size of market, access to
finance,
owner
objectives,
regulation
Principal-agent
problem
Separation of ownership and control in large firms, where
owners
want to maximise returns but
managers
want to maximise their own benefits
Firms are often not run to
profit-maximise
but to profit satisfice due to
principal-agent
problem
Enron scandal was an extreme example of
principal-agent
problem
Private sector
Part of economy owned and run by
individuals
or
groups,
including sole traders and PLCs
Public sector
Part of economy owned or controlled by
local
or
central
government,
to provide services for citizens, not for
profit
For-profit organisations
Private sector organisations run to make a
profit
and
maximise
financial benefits for
shareholders
Not-for-profit
organisations
Private
sector organisations that use any profit to support their aim of
maximising
social
welfare
and helping individuals/groups
Organic growth
Firm grows by
increasing
their output, e.g. opening new
stores
, increasing product range
Advantages of organic growth
Integration
is
expensive,
time-consuming
and high
risk
Firm
keeps
control
over
business
Disadvantages of
organic
growth
Firm may lack
expertise
or
assets
to gain through
organic
growth
Organic growth may be too
slow
for directors
Difficulty getting
new ideas
Vertical
integration
Integration of firms in the
same
industry but at
different
stages of
production
process
Backward vertical integration
Integration
taking firm back towards
supplier
of a good
Forward vertical integration
Integration taking firm towards eventual
consumer
of a good
Advantages of vertical integration
Increased
potential for
profit
Less
risk
as suppliers/buyers don't have to worry
Can control
quality
of supplies and ensure
reliable
delivery
Can
restrict
access to
retail outlets
for competitors
Disadvantages
of
vertical
integration
Firm may have no
expertise
in the industry they took over
Horizontal
integration
Integration of firms in the
same
industry at the same
stage
of
production
Advantages of
horizontal
integration
Reduces
competition
, increases
market
share,
allows
specialisation
and
rationalisation,
firm has existing
expertise
Disadvantages of
horizontal
integration
Increases
risk
as firm is 'placing all
eggs
in one basket'
Conglomerate
integration
Integration of firms in
different
industries
with no obvious
connections
Advantages of conglomerate integration
Useful where no room for
growth
in
present
market
Reduces
risk
as range of products
Easier for individual parts to
expand
Disadvantages of conglomerate integration
Firm may have no
expertise
in the new markets
Constraints on business growth
Size
of the market
Access to
finance
Owner
objectives
Regulation
Demerger
Business strategy where a
single
business is broken into two or more
components
to operate separately, be
sold
or
dissolved
Reasons for demergers
Lack of
synergies
between different parts of the business
Value
of the company/share price is
higher
when split up
Allows more
focused
companies
Impacts of
demergers
Workers could
gain
or
lose
through
promotions
or job
losses
Businesses may become more
efficient
but lose
economies
of scale
Consumers may gain from
innovation
and
efficiency
but could also face
higher prices
and reduced
quality/range