When people are unable to afford sufficient necessities to maintain life
UN definition of absolute poverty
A condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information
WorldBank definition of absolute poverty
Anyone living on less than US$1.90 a day
Economic development
Correlated with absolute poverty - the more developed a country, the fewer people in absolute poverty
Relative poverty
About people's income compared to others in their area
Relative poverty in the UK
Income of less than 60% of median household income (£27,300 in 2017) after deducting household costs
One in 5 people in the UK live below the official poverty line, with 14m people in relative poverty
Another way of defining relative poverty
Those who cannot afford to buy goods which they need to buy in order to not be considered poor according to social norms, for example an electric fridge or mobile phone
Poverty line
The minimum level of income deemed necessary to achieve an adequate standard of living in a given country
Poverty trap
Affects people on low incomes, when the tax and benefits system creates a disincentive to look for work or work for longer hours
Causes of poverty
Unemployment
Lack of skills
Health problems
Income dependency
Absolute poverty
Tends to fall as GDP increases, assuming that the state provides support to those who are unable to benefit from a growing economy
Main causes of growth of relative poverty
Higher salaries seeing larger income growth than those on lower salaries
Changes in government spending and taxation
In the UK, relative poverty has been growing for a number of reasons:
Reasons for growth of relative poverty in the UK
Growing inequality in wages growth, with the highest paid jobs seeing their wages increase higher than those on lower wages
Those in the public sector have had low wage increases and several years of falling real wages, due to the policy of austerity
The wages of the richest are now 170 times the average worker, compared to 60 times before
De-industrialisation has increased the number of service sector jobs which tend to be lower paid
Growth in underemployment, zero-hour contracts, part-time jobs and temporary jobs, all of which mean lower wages for workers
Decline of trade unions has left many workers unable to bargain for higher wages
State benefits have fallen in relative value whilst taxes have become more regressive
Long term and structural unemployment has risen
Income
A flow of earnings
Wealth
A stock of assets
Wealth is likely to be more unequally distributed than income because assets that make up wealth can be accumulated over time</b>
Lorenz curve
Shows the cumulative percentage of the population plotted against the cumulative percentage of income that those people have
Gini coefficient
The ratio of the area between the 45-degree line and the Lorenz curve divided by the whole triangle under the 45-degree curve, measured between 1 and 0 with a higher coefficient indicating more inequality
Causes of wealth and income inequality within countries
Wages
Wealth levels
Chance
Age
Causes of wealth and income inequality between countries
Wars,droughts, famines and earthquakes
Certain social groups being excluded and marginalised
Developed countries favouring each other when trading, negotiating etc.
Kuznets hypothesis
As society develops and moves from agriculture to industry, inequality increases as the wages of industrial workers rises faster than farmers, then wealth is redistributed through taxation and government spending and inequality falls
Piketty discredited the Kuznets hypothesis by arguing that inequality rises as the country develops as the rate of return on capital grows, so the richgetricher and inequality increases
Significance of capitalism
Leads to income inequality because of wage differentials and individuals owning resources and wealth being passed on or gained through saving of incomes
Equality can never be achieved in a capitalist society where the possibility of having more is important to encourage hard work
A degree of inequality is necessary and desirable, but excessive inequality causes problems with efficiency and social justice