Mental processes can be identified with physical properties of the nervous system
Phenomenalism
Ultimately, only mental objects exist
Cartesian theater
The homunculus argument
Models of Simple Decisions
Sensory processing: oddball detections
Sensory processing: motion discrimination
Nonsensory information (decision variables)
Saccade generation and the control of eye movement
1. Perceptual decision making (Newsome)
2. Integrative sensorimotor processing (Shalden)
3. Target selection and reaction times (Schall)
4. Decision variables and subjective choice (Glimcher)
Middle temporal area (V5/MT)
Extrastriate visual area, connections primarily from V1 and V2
Motion sensitive neurons with large receptive fields and preferred velocities (direction and speed)
Neurons encode for instantaneous strength of motion in preferred direction
Lateral Intraparietal area (LIP)
Region of lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus
Receives input from extrastriate cortices, including MT; major projections to FEF and SC
Topographically organized code for direction and amplitude of saccades
Pre-saccadic and peri-saccadic neural activity associated with preferred saccades proposed covert psychological processes in sensorimotor processing: attention, motor planning, and decision
Frontal Eye field (FEF)
Located in posterior to the arcuate sulcus in prefrontal cortex
Motor function: microstimulation elicits saccades, pre- and peri- saccadic activity
Direction innervation of superior colliculus and other brainstem eye movement centers
Visual function: convergence of extrastriate input (MT, LIP, TEO)
Stereotyped activity with saccade to target in response field: initial burst of activity at target onset, then low rate into slow ramping activity to a pre-saccadic burst
Superior colliculus (SC)
Locate in the dorsal midbrain
Inputs include retinal, striate, and extrastriate, and motor inputs from FEF and LIP
Outputs to multiple brainstem areas involved in oculomotor control
Retinotopic map of visual space organized into response fields, coding for saccade amplitude and directions
What should the neural correlate of decision look like?
What about post-sensory decision-related processing?
How does decision activity affect action selection?
What about the role of nonsensory information in decision making?
Integrative post-sensory processing
Integrators should how gradual increase in activity during motion stimulus if that eye movement or 'choice' is ultimately made
Rate of increase in activity should be a function of sensory signal (motion coherence): higher coherence → faster rate of rise
If a decision is made – even in the absence of a true signal (0% coherence) – activity in the integrator should still reflect the upcoming choice
Integrative post-sensory processing in LIP
Gradually rising activity predicts subsequent saccade towards or away from MF
Rate of rice of decision-coding activity dependent on strength of motion stimulus
At 0% coherence, despite no sensory signal above noise, neural activity is correlated with the monkey's subsequent choice
Drift Diffusion Models - evidence accumulation for decision making
Accumulation involves both maintaining a memory of evidence accrued so far and adding new evidence to the memory
In our task the accumulator's memory was noiseless, for both rats and humans. In contrast, the addition of new sensory evidence was the primary source of variability
What about more complex decisions?
What happens if the eye movement has to reflect a more complex decision?
Two classes of variable that affect Decisions
Current sensory information
Stored representation of environmental contingencies (expected gains/losses)
Reward
A pleasurable event that follows a specific behavior
Can be primary (e.g., food) or secondary (e.g., money), or abstract (music)
The brain uses rewards to learn, choose and prepare/execute goals. A pleasurable event that follows a specific behaviors
The function of reward
Elicit approach behavior (either through innate mechanisms or leaning)
Increase the frequency and intensity of a behavior that leads to a reward (learning)
Induce subjective feelings of pleasure (hedonia) and positive emotional states
Wanting
Elicit approach behavior. Motivation for reward, conscious, or unconscious desires for incentives or cognitive goals
Learning
Learning the associations, representations, and predictions about future rewards based on past experiences (reward prediction error)
Liking
Induce subjective feelings of pleasure (hedonia) and positive emotional states
Dopamine System
Stimulation of dopamine pathways is "rewarding (motivating)"
Dopamine and Reward
Many rewards seem to lead to release of dopamine (DA) in the striatum
Dopamine is released during basic drives (i.e., hunger)
DA is released in the rat Nacc right before and during copulation, but not afterwards
DA is released in the human caudate nucleus when presented with food stimulation in a food-deprived state
DA is released in both NAcc and caudate when participants are playing video games for money
Dopamine receptor binding
DA binding is lower in addiction
Massive and repeated relapse of dopamine makes the system less sensitive to "typical" rewards
Reward Prediction Error
Dopamine neurons are active when drop of liquid is delivered outside any behavioral task
Earliest predictor of reward signals dopamine response instead of fully predicted reward
Dopamine neurons will be depressed at the time of the predicted reward if it fails to occur
DA provides an error prediction signal to aid in goal-directed behavior
DA response = reward occurred - reward predicted
Rewards serve various functions, primarily they serve to drive behavior
Rewards can be primary or secondary in nature
Primary = innate in the environment (liquids, food)
Secondary = learned through associations (money)
Dopamine is important for reward processing
Dopamine is released in the striatum during rewarding situations
One hypothesis about DA function suggests that dopamine codes for prediction errors during learning, helping us understand how to change our behaviors to attain a goal
BOLD signal in stratum correlates parametrically, trial-by-trial with prediction error (O'Doherty et al. 2003)
This signal modulated up & down by dopaminergic drugs (Pessiglione et al 2006)
Prediction error hypothesis of dopamine
The idea: Dopamine encodes a reward prediction error