A type of social influence where a person yields to group pressures and changes their behaviour or opinion as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group
Types of conformity (Kelman)
Internalisation
Identification
Compliance
Internalisation
Making the beliefs, values, attitude and behaviour of the group your own (the strongest type of conformity, often occurs as a result of informational social influence)
Identification
Temporary/short term change of behaviour and beliefs only in the presence of a group (middle level)
Compliance
Following other people's ideas/going along with the group to gain their approval or avoid disapproval (lowest/weakest level of conformity)
Informational social influence
When someone conforms because they want to be right, so they look to others by copying or obeying them, to have the right answer in a situation
Normative social influence
When someone conforms because they want to be liked and be part of a group; when a person's need to be accepted or have approval from a group drives compliance
NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard's 'Two Process Model'
It may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms
Asch's study
123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; 1 true participant and 5 confederates
Participants and confederates presented with 4 lines; 3 comparison lines and 1 standard line
Confederates gave the same incorrect answer for 12 out of 18 trials
Asch observed how often the participant would give the same incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer
36.8% conformed, 25% never conformed, 75% conformed at least once
In a control trial, only 1% of responses given by participants were incorrect
Group size
An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group
Unanimity of majority
An individual is more likely to conform when the group is unanimous i.e. all give the same answer, as opposed to them all giving different answers
Task difficulty
An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult
When the task is difficult, we are more uncertain of our answer so we look to others for confirmation. The more difficult the task the greater the conformity
This suggests that informational social influence is a major mechanism for conformity when the situation is ambiguous and the individual does not have enough of their own knowledge or information to make an informed decision independently
Zimbardo's study
24 American male undergraduate students
Aim: To investigate how readily people would conform to the social roles in a simulated environment
Procedure: Basement of Stanford University converted into simulated prison, participants randomly assigned roles of guard or prisoner
Findings: Identification occurred very fast, guards began to harass and torment prisoners, prisoners became submissive and defended the guards
Agentic state
When a person believes that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions
Agentic shift
When a person shifts from an autonomous state (where they believe they will take responsibility for their own actions) to an agentic state
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as credible in terms of being morally good/right, and legitimate
In Milgram's study, the participants saw the experimenter as legitimate as they knew he was a scientist and therefore likely to be knowledgeable and responsible
Agentic state
When people believe they are acting on behalf of an authority figure, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as credible in terms of being morally good/right, and legitimate (i.e. legally based or law abiding)
Students are more likely to listen to their parents or teachers than other unknown adults
Expert authority
When the authority figure is seen as legitimate because they are a knowledgeable and responsible expert, like a scientist
The study suffered from demand characteristics and lacked ecological validity
The sample only consisted of American male students, so the findings cannot be generalised to other genders and cultures
There was a lack of fully informed consent due to the deception required
Participants were not protected from stress, anxiety, emotional distress and embarrassment
Proximity
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter was in the same room (62.5%) compared to being in a different room (20.5%)
Location
Participants obeyed more when the study was conducted at a prestigious university, as the prestige demands obedience and increases trust in the researchers
Uniform
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter wore a lab coat, as it gave them higher status and a greater sense of legitimacy
Debriefing was thorough and careful, and a follow-up study found most participants were glad to have been part of the study and felt they learned something
The research has real-life applications in highlighting the problem of obedience to destructive authority figures
The findings have been highly replicated, increasing reliability
External validity has been established by supporting studies like Hofling et al (1966)
There were serious ethical issues including deception, psychological harm, and the socially sensitive nature of the findings
There were issues with internal and ecological validity
Authoritarian personality
Belief that people should completely obey or submit to their authority figures, and suppress their own beliefs. Characterized by a 'fixed' cognitive style and tendency to adopt absolutist/'black and white' thinking.