Systematic procedures used to observe, describe, predict and explain behaviour and mental processes
Hypotheses
Four types of hypotheses:
Null Hypotheses
Alternative Hypotheses
One-tailed
Two-tailed
Null Hypotheses
These predict that no difference will be found in the results between the conditions. Typically written 'There will be no difference'
Alternative Hypotheses
These predict that there will be a significant difference in the results between the two conditions. Also known as experimental hypothesis
One-tailed hypotheses
These state the specific direction the researcher expects the results to move in e.g. higher, lower, more, less
Two-tailed hypotheses
These state that a difference will be found between the conditions of independent variable but does not state the direction or relationship. Typically these are always written 'There will be a difference'
Hypotheses summary
Once research is conducted and results found, psychologists must accept one hypothesis and reject the other - so if a difference is found, the psychologist would accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null, opposite applies if no difference is found
Sampling
The process of selecting a representative group from the population under study
Representative
The extent to which a sample mirrors a researcher's target population and reflects its characteristics
Generalisability
The extent to which their findings can be applied to the larger population of which their sample was a part
Volunteer sampling
Consists of people who have volunteered to be in the study
+ Often achieves a large sample size via reaching a wide audience
-May all display similar characteristics
Opportunity sampling
Participants who are both accessible and willing to take part are targeted e.g. employees from a local employer near the lab
+ Method is easy and inexpensive
-Consequent sample may not be representative
Stratified sampling
Here the sampler divides or 'stratifies' the target group into sections, each showing a key characteristic which should be present in the final sample. Then each of these sections is sampled individually
+ Avoids the problem of misrepresentation
-Takes more time and resources
-Care must be taken to ensure each key characteristic is selected
Systematic sampling
Chosen for selecting from a target group e.g. every fourth person in a list could be used in the sample. Differs from random sampling in that it does not give an equal chance of selection to each individual in target group
+ Offers an unbiased chance
-If list not randomised, bias may be present
Random sampling
Gives every member of the target group an equal chance of being selected for the sample
+ Reasonable chance of achieving a representative sample
-Small minority groups may distort results
-Can be impractical
Snowball sampling
Researchers find a few participants, and then ask them to find participants themselves and so on
Quota sampling
Researchers will be told to ensure the sample fits a certain quota, for example they might be told to find 90 PPs. with 30 of them being unemployed
Independent variable
The one the experimenter manipulates (the thing that changes between the conditions the participants are place into) assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable
Dependent variable
The thing that the experimenter measures
Operationalisation of variables
Means making them quantifiable
Extraneous variables
All variables which are not independent but that could affect the results of the experiment
Demand characteristics
A type of extraneous variable that occurs if the PPs work out the aims of the study, they may begin to act a certain way
Experimental design
Refers to how participants are allocated to each condition of the independent variable, such as control or experimental group
Independent design
Each participant is selected for only one group
Matched-pairs design
Each participant is selected for only one group, but the participants in the two groups are matched for some relevant factor or factors
Repeated measures design
Each participant appears in both groups, so that there are exactly the same participants in each group
Order effects
Occurs when participants' responses in the various conditions are affected by the order of conditions to which they were exposed
Counterbalancing
Best way of preventing order effects from disrupting findings
Usually presented as ABBA
Lab experiments
Conducted in a well-controlled environment, therefore accurate and objective measurements are possible
Field experiments
Conducted in the everyday environment of the participants. The experimenter still manipulates the IV, but in a real-life setting
Natural experiments
When a naturally occurring IV is investigated that isn't deliberately manipulated, it exists anyway. Participants are not randomly allocated, and the natural event may only occur rarely
Case studies
In depth investigations of a person, group, event, or community. It uses information from a range of sources, such as from the person concerned and also their family and friends
Correlation
Means association; it is a measure of the extent to which two variables are related.
Positive correlation
If an increase in one variable tends to be associated with an increase in the other
Negative correlation
If an increase in one variable tends to be associated with a decrease in the other
No correlation
Occurs when there is no relationship between variables
Structured interviews
A fixed, predetermined set of questions is put to every participant in the same order and in the same way
Unstructured interviews
There are no set questions, and the participant can raise whatever topics he/she feels are relevant and ask them in their own way. Questions are posed about participants answers to the subject
Open questions
Are designed to encourage a full, meaningful answer using the subject's own knowledge and feelings - Open to any answers
Closed questions
Can be answered with a simple "yes" or "no" or specific information, limiting the depth of response