Need to assess significance of place before policy decisions were made => appearance of values-led approach in heritage management + local communities voiced
Understand the place
1. Assess significance
2. Develop policy
European Heritage Strategy for 21st century (council of Europe)
Social component
Territorial and economic development
Knowledge and education
Europe: Council of Europe
Valletta Convention 1992
European Landscape Convention 2001
Faro Convention 2005
Valletta Convention 1992
Multilateral treaty + international legally binding within Europe
"Malta-archaeology"
Objectives of Valletta Convention 1992
Integrate archaeology into urban planning
Cooperations and consultation processes
Set standards for funding, archaeology and conservational methods
Promote educational actions and public awareness
London 1969
Importance of archaeological heritage
Professionalisation of archaeological excavations
Protecting archaeological sites
Against illicit trade
Dutch Monuments Act 1988
Excavation permit for government agencies
Protecting by listing monuments
Banning of illegal digging
Ownership of archaeological heritage
The need to create shared memories - political influence
European integration and globalisation (1945 - present) - Leaders depend on national identity to spread their political agenda
Archaeology and human rights = treaties and conventions cannot prevent atrocities
Mass graves as a results of genocides => conceal the crime and prevent individual identification
Legal framework: after WW2 => UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Forensic archaeology
Exhumation = genetic analysis so first find grave, excavate the grave (stratigraphy, recover evidence, document provenience, determine evidence is 'in-situ', limit postmortem damage), anthropological and forensic study
Argentina: Dirty War (1976-1983) 9000 people disappeared into ocean and buried in anonymous graces, exhumation used to identify but complicated the investigation
Archaeological contributions to Basque and Catalonian Nationalism
19th century: Spanish National History = Iberian Peninsula, Iberian South-east, Celtic North-west
Commonality between archaeologists: search for their roots in prehistory
Ayodhya - Many Indian archaeologists are content to attach ethnic and linguistic labels to newly discovered cultures (descriptive fashion)
16th century Babri mosque destroyed by Hindu fundamentalist militants (anti-Muslim nationalism)
Consequences: BJP political party established emphasising Hindu identity as Indian identity in 80s => responsible for demolition as demonstration of Hindu supremacy (but did not directly destroy it)
1970s = first reflections on archaeology and social values
1980s = archaeology and politics
Science itself is not value free (social and cultural forces)
1960s onwards "French theory" (influenced USA) - Critical regarding politics and society
Analysis of power structures in society (needed to create change)
Reflexive sociology: researcher need to reflect on their habitus (act as you learn)
Social identity
Feeling of belonging as individual to any concept (class, profession)
Limitation: the freedom of diversity = stereotypes as narrative boundary
Ideology
Origins and ancestry
Politics
Compilation of frames and ideas that legitimises ideas regarding origins and superiority of cultures
Concept of culture in archaeology - Key issues: Setting the agenda, Appropriation, Manipulation of archaeological record, Exclusion of alternative perspectives
Material culture from past = meaning and importance in presence
Meaning and importance are not value free
Current heritage perspectives
Universal perspective: value of heritage (1970s)
European perspective: identity and memory (1990s)
Human rights perspective: wellbeing (2005)
3 modes are reflected in declarations on heritage produced by Council of Europe: titles of declaration