Extremely influential philosophical movement in the 18th century that believed in the power of reason and science to explain how the world works and in the possibility of using this knowledge to create a better society
Just as the natural sciences enabled us to control nature, sociology would bring true knowledge of society that could be used to eradicate problems such as poverty, injustice and conflict
Belief that it is possible and desirable to apply the logic and methods of the natural sciences to the study of society and this will provide the basis for solving social problems and achieving progress
Belief that reality exists outside and independently of the human mind
Nature is made-up of objective, observable, physical facts such as rocks, cells, stars etc. These are external to our minds and exist whether we like it or not
Society is an objective factual reality- it is a real 'thing' made-up of social facts that exist 'out there', independently of individuals, just like the physical world
For positivists, reality is not random or chaotic but patterned, and we can observe this empirical (factual) patterns or regularity systematically to explain them
For positivists the patterns we observe can be explained by finding the facts that cause them e.g. the social fact of educational failure caused by another social fact, material deprivation
Believe sociology is about unobservable internal meanings - in other words it is about individual's thoughts and feelings which of course go on inside people's brains and these cannot be observed or measured empirically as scientific methods would demand
Individuals who interpret and respond to the world around them in different ways
Have free will and can exercise choice and therefore rather than responding automatically to what is going on around them they interpret situations and choose how to respond to them
For interpretivists, individuals are not puppets on strings, manipulated by 'social facts' (as positivists would argue), but independent beings who construct their world through their own interpretations, meanings and actions
Emile Durkheim (late 1800s) believed society can and should be studied scientifically by observing patterns of behaviour and establishing cause and effect to explain them
Durkheim used QUANTITATIVE data from official statistics, and he looked for patterns in suicide rates over several decades in a number of European countries
He was able to use the evidence to argue that suicide is not simply the result of individual actions, but in fact it is caused by social facts – factors external to individuals within the structure of society that shapes their behaviour
Interpretivists focus on the meanings of suicide for the individuals involved
Jack Douglas (1967) criticises Durkheim's study of suicide on the grounds that the suicide statistics Durkheim used may have been inaccurate, and that Durkheim ignored the meanings of the act for those who kill themselves
A paradigm defines what Science is and provides a set of shared basic assumptions, principles and methods
Currently sociology is pre-paradigmatic and therefore prescientific. There is no shared paradigm – no agreement about what to study, how to study it, what we are likely to find etc.
The application of systematic, empirical, and analytical methods used in natural sciences to the study of human society, with the goal of developing laws and theories that can explain and predict social phenomena.