Holism - the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Analysing component parts is not enough; it does not capture the whole person
Reductionism - explaining a phenomenon by breaking it down into its constituent parts.
Parsimony - complex phenomena should be explained by the simplest underlying principles possible
The effect of conformity to social roles in Zimbardo's experiment could not be studied on one individual but it was the interaction of the group as a whole which was important. Therefore, holism provides a more complete explanation
Holistic explanations are speculative and cannot be scientifically tested
If researchers accept that many different factors may contribute to a disorder such as depression, it is difficult to find the most likely factor which has implications for providing the correct treatment
A reductionist approach often forms the basis of scientific research allowing operationalised variables to be established.
Simplifying complex behaviour into smaller less complex components can lead to a loss of validity
Levels of explanation- how explanations vary from those at a lower level focusing on basic components or units in reductionism to those at a higher more holistic multivariable level as regarded by holism
Biological reductionism - reducing behaviour to physiological levels e.g brain structures or genes
Environmental reductionism - reducing behaviour to stimulus-response links which can be tested and explained using laboratory experiments
reductionism allows experiments to be conducted in meaningful and reliable ways e.g Skinner, giving psychology greater credibility
Interactionism considers how different levels of explanation may combine and interact
an example of interactionism is the diathesis-stress model, which has been used to explain the onset of mental disorders such as schizophrenia
The interactionist approach has helped develop a more holistic treatment for schizophrenia combining drug and family therapy