The body of law developed from judicialdecisions over time
Case Law Materials
Decisions Proper: Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Sandiganbayan, Court of Tax Appeals, Regional Trial Courts, MTC, MeTC & MCTC
Subordinate Decisions: Electoral Tribunal (Senate and HoR), Administrative Agencies Exercising Quasi-Judicial Powers (Commission on Elections, Civil Service Commission, Commission on Audit, National Labor Relations Commission, Insurance Commission, Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board, Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board)
Case Law Research
1. Determining the case law that is binding or persuasive regarding a particular issue
2. Gathering and analyzing the relevant case law
3. Searching for a specific case that applies the law to a set of facts in a particular way
Binding Authority
When it comes from the decisions of Supreme Court and it is the ratio decidendi of the case
Persuasive Authority
A court is not bound to follow dicta from prior decision, it may do so if it is carefully reasoned
This is more so if the dicta comes from a respected justice such as the late Justice J.B.L. Reyes
Aside from dicta, persuasive authority can come from decisions of appellate courts in other jurisdictions
Doctrine of Precedent
Lower courts are required to take account of and follow the decisions made by the higher courts where the material facts are the same
Stare Decisis
"Stand by things decided"
It requires other courts to follow the rule established in a decision of the Supreme Court thereof
That decision becomes a judicial precedent to be followed in subsequent cases by all courts
The doctrine of stare decisis is based on the principle that once a question of law has been examined and decided, it should be deemed settled and closed to further argument
Res Judicata
The principle states that a judgment on the merits in a previous case rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction would bind a subsequent case if, between the first and second actions, there exists an identity of parties, of subject matter, and of causes of action
Res judicata prevents a party from bringing a claim once that particular claim has been subjected to a final judgment in some previous lawsuit
'An error of fact or law on the face of the award may be corrected under s69(5)'
RATIO DECIDENDI
A Latin term which refers to the underlying reason or principle which justifies a court decision. In other words, it is the reasoning why the decision is so. (Philippine Supreme Court, Fundamentals of Decision
Writing for Judges)
OBITER DICTUM
Latin term which refers to an averment, assertion, or observation stated as an aside or a "by the way," or said in passing by a court that is not necessary in deciding the issues before the court.
THROUGH CONVENTIONAL METHOD
Ratio decidendi must be arising from a legal dispute.
The component must be essential for figuring out lis.
It must be directly address the problem.
A fair argument and decision must have been made.
Reversal
has reference to the action of the Supreme Court on a lower court's judgments in the same
particular controversy. When the Supreme Court reviews the judgment of the lower court in a case and concludes the lower court reached an erroneous result in the case, it will "reverse" or set aside the
lower court's judgment.
Overruling
Occurs when a court overturns or abolishes a rule established in a binding
precedent. When the Supreme Court "overrules" one of its past decisions, the conclusiveness of that earlier decision as a settlement of its particular controversy is not affected, but the overruled decision is no longer an authoritative precedent for other
cases that may arise in the future.
DOCTRINE OF PROSPECTIVE OVERRULING
When a doctrine of the Court is overruled and a different view is adopted, the new doctrine should be applied prospectively and should not apply to parties who had relied on the old