Research methods

Subdecks (1)

Cards (116)

  • What is an aim?
    A general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate
  • What is a hypothesis?

    Statement that is made at the start of a study and states the relationship between variables that can be tested
  • What is a directional hypothesis?
    Researcher makes clear the sort of difference that is anticipated between two conditions
    - Used when the findings of previous research suggest a particular outcome
    E.G. People who drink caffeine will be have a faster reaction time to the people who don't drink caffeine
  • What is a non-directional hypothesis?
    simply states that there is a difference between conditions.
    - Used when there is no previous research or findings from earlier studies are contradictory
    E.G. There will be a difference in the reaction time between people who drink caffeine and people who don't
  • What is an independent variable?

    variable that is manipulated
  • What is a dependent variable?

    variable that is measured
  • What is operationalisation?

    Clearly defining variables in terms of how they can be measured
  • What is an extraneous variable?

    Any other variable that might potentially interfere with the IV or DV that should be controlled or removed
  • What is a confouding variable?
    Factors other than the IV that may effect your results.
  • What are demand characteristics?

    cues in an experiment that tell the participant what behaviour is expected. Leading the "please-U effect or the screw-U effect to occur"
  • What is the investigator effect?
    Any unwanted influence of the investigator on the research outcome
  • What is randomisation?
    The use of chance in order to control for the effects of bias when designing materials and deciding the order of conditions.
  • What is standardisation?
    Using exactly the same formalised procedures and instructions for all participants in a research study.
  • What is experimental design?
    The different ways in which the testing of participants can be organised in relation to the experimental conditions
  • What is an independent groups design?
    Two separate groups of participants experience two different conditions of the experiment
  • Evaluation of an independent groups design
    Strengths
    - Order effects aren't a problem so pp's are less likely to guess the aim (Demand Characteristics)
    Weakness'
    - Participants who occupy the groups are not the same, therefore participant variables may affect the results.
    - Problem dealt with random allocation
  • What is a repeated measures design?

    All participants take part in all conditions
  • Evaluation of Repeated Measures Design
    Strengths
    - Controlled participant variables
    - Fewer pp's needed
    Weakness'
    - Order effects can effect the result E.G. demand characteristics, fatigue etc Dealt through counterbalancing
  • What is counterbalancing?
    An attempt to control for the effects of order in a repeated measures design: half the participants experience the conditions in one order, and the other half in the opposite order. (ABBA)
  • What is a matched pairs design?
    Pairs of participants are first matched on some variable(s) that may affect the DV. Then one member of the pair is assigned to Condition A and the other to Condition B.
  • Evaluation of Matched Pairs Design
    Strengths
    - Reduces order effects so demand characteristics are less of a problem
    Weakness'
    - Participants can never be matched exactly
    - Matching can be time consuming and expensive especially of a pre test is required.
  • What is a lab experiment?
    They are experiments conducted in highly controlled environments.
  • Evaluation of a Lab experiment
    Strengths
    - High control over extraneous variables
    - High internal validity
    - Replication is more possible

    Limitations
    - May lack generalisability
    - Low external validity
    - High chance of demand characteristics
    - Low mundane realism
  • What is a field experiment?
    An experiment that takes place in a natural setting within which the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV
  • Evaluation of field experiments
    Strengths
    - Higher mundane realism
    - High external validity

    Limitations
    - Low internal validity to lack of control of extraneous variables.
  • What is a natural experiment?
    Experiment where the change in IV isn't brought by the researcher and researcher records the effect it has on the DV
  • Evaluation of a natural experiment
    Strengths
    - Provide opportunities that may have otherwise not have been done for practical or ethical reasons
    - High external validity

    Limitations
    - Change in IV occurs rarely so limits generalisations
    - Participants aren't randomly allocated to conditions
  • What is a quasi-experimental design?

    IV based on an existing difference between people e.g. age, gender.
  • Evaluation of a quasi - experimental design?
    Strengths
    - Often carried out under controlled conditions thus sharing the strengths of a lab experiment

    Limitations
    - Cannot randomly allocate participants to conditions so there may be confounding variables
  • What is the target population?

    Group of individuals that a researcher is interested in studying
  • What is a sample?

    Group of people selected from the target population to take part in the study
  • What is a sampling technique?
    Method used used to select the sample from the target population
  • What is a random sample?
    All members of the target population have an equal chance of being selected
    - list of members of the target population is obtained
    - Members assigned a number
    - sample is generated through a lottery method ( hat or computer based randomiser)
  • Evaluation of random sampling
    Strengths
    - Free from researcher bias

    Limitations
    - Time consuming to conduct
    - There's still a chance you can end up with an unrepresentative sample
    - Selected pp's may refuse to take part so you end up with a sort of volunteer sample
  • What is systematic sampling?
    Every nth member of the target population is selected
  • Evaluation of systematic sampling
    Strengths
    - avoids researcher bias

    Limitations
    - Selected pp's may refuse to take part so you end up with a sort of volunteer sample
  • What is stratified sampling?

    Dividing the population into strata then selecting a sample from each of these groups, reflects the proportions of people in the target population in the sample
  • Evaluation of stratified sampling
    Strengths
    - avoids researcher bias
    - ensures a representative sample

    Limitations
    - Selected pp's may refuse to take part so you end up with a sort of volunteer sample
  • What is opportunity sampling?

    Researchers may simply decide to select anyone who happens to be willing and available
  • Evaluation of opportunity sampling
    Strengths
    - convenient
    - saves time and money

    Limitations
    - Unrepresentative
    - Researcher bias
    - Selected pp's may refuse to take part so you end up with a sort of volunteer sample