Environmental factors - location, group size, language
Team factors-how long teams been together, creation of partnership
Prescribed Leaders
Chosen by higher authority e.g. team manager
Emergent Leaders
Those who achieve leadership status by gaining the respect and support of the group
Leadership Styles
Autocratic
Democratic
Autonomous
Laissez-faire
Autocratic leadership
Task orientated, makes all decisions, didactic approach, command style for cognitive performers
Democratic leadership
Makes some decisions, allows players to volunteer
Autonomous leadership
Requires high level of trust, used with highly motivated and experienced performers, little input/decisions
Laissez-faire leadership
Little group input/decisions, "laid back" approach, can lead to little group cohesion
Theories of Leadership
Trait Theory
Social/Observational Learning Theory
Interactional Theory
Trait Theory
Leaders are born with traits and qualities to be a leader, leadership is innate
Social/Observational Learning Theory
Leaders are made, anyone can be taught, learned by observing behaviour of other good leaders
Interactional Theory
Interaction between individual and their situation, traits and environment interact
Leader Behaviours
Relationship-orientated
Task-orientated
Relationship-orientated leader
Focus on support, motivation, development of people on their team, encourage communication, more successful in moderate situations, develop respect and trust
Task-orientated leader
Highly goal focused, complete tasks within deadlines, define roles of whole team, ensure members stay on task, effective with less experienced, less skilled performers
Fielder's Contingency Model
Correct leadership style is dependent on the favourability of the situation
Situations in Fielder's Contingency Model
Most favourable
Moderately favourable
Least favourable
Most favourable situation
Coach has good relationship with players, strong support, clear and structured discipline, excellent facilities, skilful and motivated athletes
Moderately favourable situation
Coach has friendly relationship, accept most decisions, good discipline, limited facilities, reasonable relationship with group
Least favourable situation
Coach not respected, poor discipline structure, poor facilities, no community support, poor relationships, poor performer ability and motivation, hostile environment
Most favourable situation
Task-orientated leader
Moderately favourable situation
Relationship-orientated leader
Least favourable situation
Task-orientated leader
Chelladurai's Multidimensional Model of Leadership
Antecedents
Leader Behaviour
Consequences
Antecedents in Chelladurai's Model
Situational Characteristics
Leader Characteristics
Member Characteristics
Leader Behaviour in Chelladurai's Model
Required Behaviour
Actual Behaviour
Preferred Behaviour
Consequences in Chelladurai's Model
Performance
Satisfaction
Autocratic leadership
Team at top of league, can win title, high ability players, high respect and experience
Democratic leadership
Team in middle of table, comfortable position, achieved beyond expectations, moderate skill level players
Laissez-faire leadership
Team in relegation battle, limited games left, poor facilities, lack of experience/skills/time, cognitive learners