Existence of duty of care for personal injury and property damages
Caparo V Dickman
developed Caparo criteria (ONLY MENTION IF HASN'T CREATED PRECEDENT)
Kent V Griffiths (foreseeability)
Ambulance called for claimant. Ambulance failed to arrive in time and claimant suffered respiratoryattack - reasonablyforeseeable that claimant would suffer further harm
Bourhill V Young (proximity)
Pregnant woman saw motorcyclist get into accident who died. She approached the scene and saw blood. She later gave birth to a stillbaby - not proximity in time, space and relationship
McLoughlin V O'Brien (Proximity)
Claimant'sfamily were involved in serious car crash. She saw family beforetreated and suffered severeshock, personalitychange and depression - proximity as she saw immediateaftermath
Hill V Chiefconstableof West Yorkshire (fair, just and reasonable)
Hill final victim of serial killer. Hill's mother made a claim that police had been negligent
USE FOR AN OMISSION
Robinson V Chief constable of WestYorkshire
Police officers attempted to arrest a suspected drug dealer which was foreseeable that the drug dealer would try to resist. Dealer escapes and police officers fell over elderly woman - use existingprecedents to establish duty of care exists