Right realism sees criminals as making rationalchoices to be criminal
Right Realists punish criminals harshly, rules should be there to protect victims and stop deviance
People who work hard, get good things in life
Poor people are lazy and don’t work hard enough
Situational Crime Prevention (SCP):
Reduce opportunities to commit by reducing opportunity and being rewarded for criminal acts.
Measures may include increased CCTV, campaigns to encourage to lockdoors and cars or anti-terrorism measures such as bag checks or traffic-blocking bollards in city centres.
SCP may also include increasing sentences for criminals so the cost of committing the act (Time in prison) outweighs the reward of the criminal act.
Effectiveness of SCP:
Displacement is a problem, where crime is simply moved by measures such as CCTV or extra policing
It could lead criminals to targeting more vulnerable people.
Environmental Crime Prevention (ECP):
the brokenwindowtheory argues that disorderly areas send out a message that no one cares enough to challenge crime.
Law abiding citizens will leave such areas, house prices will go down and more criminal activity will occur and go unchallenged.
Such areas will need policies in place to reduce criminality in the neighbourhood
Environmental Improvement Strategy (EIS):
Signs of disorder must quickly be rectified with graffiti removed, vandalism repaired and streets kept tidy
Zero Tolerance Policing Strategy (ZTP)
Police must have a tough zerotolerancestance towards even minor offences such as grafitti
They should focus on “qualityoflife” offences such as begging, prostitution and vandalism.
Is ZTPeffective:
Crime was reduced in New York in the 1990’s once introduced (but the same happened in other US cities where there was no ZTP)
Males and Macallair found that in their study that curfews can increase Juvenile crimes.
ZTP has been found to regularly target ethnic minorities and working class.
ZTP and SCP do not tackle underlying causes of crime
”Prison Works” according to right realist Politicians because…
It incapacitates criminals by taking them out of the population
It acts as a deterrent as the cost of losing your freedom is greater than the reward of the crime.
Politicians in the 1990’s argues that tough sentences were popular with the public so the policy became known as “PenalPopulism”
Penal Populism and Imprisonment:
In 1997, the conservatives brought in the Crime Act which created mandatory minimum sentences for repeat offenders.
Automatic Life sentences for second or sexual offences
A minimum of 7 years for a Class A drug trafficking conviction
A minimum of 3 years for a third domestic burglary.
Penal Populism and Imprisonment:
Tony Blair’s new labour government care to power in 1997 and said it would be tough on crime and tough on causes of crime
Penal Populism led to rising number in jail, from 45000 in 1993 to 80000 by 2021
England and Wales imprison a higher proportion of their population than any other Western European country
Prison suicides, assaults on staff and murders continue to increase every year.
Is prison effective:
Incapacitation- prison works temporarily while the offender is in prison
Rehabilitation- overcrowding and budget cuts alongside lack of education, skills programmes and training means this is less effective.
Recidivism (reoffending)- 48% of inmates are convicted again within 1 year of release.
Deterrence- Studies show first od imprisonment does not deter criminals as right realists this it does