Falsification

    Cards (15)

    • What is the falsification principle?
      Religious language must be able to be proven wrong
    • Who came up with the falsification principle?
      Anthony Flew
    • What was Flew’s parable?
      • 2 explorers (believer and sceptic) come across a garden. The believer says someone must look after it. The sceptic disagrees
      • They wait for the gardener to arrive and he never does
      • The believer says he must be invisible, and they set traps to catch him
      • When they don’t catch him, the believer adjusts his beliefs to fit with what they have found, but still says there is a gardener
      • The sceptic asks “what remains of your original assertion? How does an invisible, intangible gardener differ from and imaginary gardener or no gardener at all?”
    • What does Flew say happens when we try and describe God?

      He dies a death of a thousand qualifications - we define him out of existence
    • What makes a statement meaningful for Flew?
      It must assert something, and deny the opposite of that assertion
    • What does Flew ask?
      “Under what circumstances would you change your mind?”
      If you don’t have an answer there is no point in saying anything at all
    • Who came up with ’bliks’?
      R. M. Hare
    • What is a ’blik’?

      A belief we have that may be right or wrong, but impacts the life of the individual with that blik
    • What is Hare’s example of a blik?

      A lunatic is convinced all university dons are out to get him, despite all counter-evidence for this
    • What are religious claims to Hare?
      Expressions of personal attitudes. They are not testable
    • Who came up with the parable of the partisan?
      Basil Mitchell
    • What is the parable of the partisan?
      • A country is occupied by the enemy during war and the partisan is a resistance fighter
      • A stranger asks the partisan to trust him
      • The stranger is sometimes seen to be working against the partisan, but the partisan continues to trust the stranger
      • The partisan convinces himself there is an explanation
    • How does Mitchell use the parable of the partisan?
      Religious language is cognitive - there is evidence for belief we just don’t know it yet. The stranger is on one side or another, we just don’t know
    • What is cognitive language?

      Language is true or false
    • What is non-cognitive language?
      Language is not true or false it is just an expression
    See similar decks