Falsification

Cards (15)

  • What is the falsification principle?
    Religious language must be able to be proven wrong
  • Who came up with the falsification principle?
    Anthony Flew
  • What was Flew’s parable?
    • 2 explorers (believer and sceptic) come across a garden. The believer says someone must look after it. The sceptic disagrees
    • They wait for the gardener to arrive and he never does
    • The believer says he must be invisible, and they set traps to catch him
    • When they don’t catch him, the believer adjusts his beliefs to fit with what they have found, but still says there is a gardener
    • The sceptic asks “what remains of your original assertion? How does an invisible, intangible gardener differ from and imaginary gardener or no gardener at all?”
  • What does Flew say happens when we try and describe God?

    He dies a death of a thousand qualifications - we define him out of existence
  • What makes a statement meaningful for Flew?
    It must assert something, and deny the opposite of that assertion
  • What does Flew ask?
    “Under what circumstances would you change your mind?”
    If you don’t have an answer there is no point in saying anything at all
  • Who came up with ’bliks’?
    R. M. Hare
  • What is a ’blik’?

    A belief we have that may be right or wrong, but impacts the life of the individual with that blik
  • What is Hare’s example of a blik?

    A lunatic is convinced all university dons are out to get him, despite all counter-evidence for this
  • What are religious claims to Hare?
    Expressions of personal attitudes. They are not testable
  • Who came up with the parable of the partisan?
    Basil Mitchell
  • What is the parable of the partisan?
    • A country is occupied by the enemy during war and the partisan is a resistance fighter
    • A stranger asks the partisan to trust him
    • The stranger is sometimes seen to be working against the partisan, but the partisan continues to trust the stranger
    • The partisan convinces himself there is an explanation
  • How does Mitchell use the parable of the partisan?
    Religious language is cognitive - there is evidence for belief we just don’t know it yet. The stranger is on one side or another, we just don’t know
  • What is cognitive language?

    Language is true or false
  • What is non-cognitive language?
    Language is not true or false it is just an expression