'A person is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediately before or at the time of doing so, as in order to do so, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any fear of being then and there subjected to force'
Actus reus
Theft + use of force or seeking to put any person in fear of force in order to steal
Mens rea
Theft + intention to use force in order to steal
A completed force
Theft S1
Dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the victim of it
R v Zerei
Threat of force
Force or seeking to put anyone in fear of force to steal (Dawson and James 1976)
Level of force = jury discretion
P v DPP (2012): Force or threat must be against the person
B+R v DPP (2007): It doesn't matter if the victim didn't fear force only that the D intended it
Immediately before or at the time of the theft
Hale (1979) Lockley (1995): Force and theft can be part of a continuing act
In order to steal - force must be used with the intent to steal
In order to steal
Force must be used in order to steal
Mens rea
MR for theft
Intention to use force
MR for theft
Dishonesty - Ivey test
Intention to permanently deprive
Intention to use force
Fagan v MPC (1969), R v Mohan (1976), R v Woolin (1998) - emphasise intent to use force
Direct = Main aim (Mohan)
Oblique = Virtual certainty + D foresaw it (Woolin)