Mental representation of a baby's first relationship with their primary attachment figure, which acts as a template for future childhood and adult relationships
Quality of a baby's first attachment
Powerfully affects the nature of their future relationships
Secure attachment
Baby assumes relationships are meant to be loving and reliable, seeks out functional relationships, behaves appropriately within them
Insecure-avoidant attachment
Baby struggles to form relationships, may be too uninvolved or emotionally close
Insecure-resistant attachment
Baby may be controlling and argumentative in relationships
Attachment type
Associated with quality of peer relationships in childhood
Secure attachment
Children very unlikely to be involved in bullying
Insecure-avoidant attachment
Children most likely to be victims of bullying
Insecure-resistant attachment
Children most likely to be bullies
Internal working models
Affect romantic relationships and parental relationships with own children in adulthood
Secure attachment as a baby
Conveys advantages for future development
Disorganised attachment as a baby
Seriously disadvantages children
Not all evidence supports close links between early attachment and later development
Most research on link between early attachment and later development uses retrospective measures, which have validity issues
Associations between attachment quality and later development may be affected by confounding variables
Disinhibited attachment
Attention-seeking, clinginess and social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all adults, both familiar and unfamiliar
Adoption before 6 months
Rarely displays disinhibited attachment
Adoption after 6 months
Shows signs of disinhibited attachment
Institutionalisation
Leads to disinhibited attachment and intellectual disability
Adoption before 6 months
Allows recovery of intellectual development
Romanian orphanage studies have improved understanding of effects of early institutional care and how to prevent worst effects
Romanian orphanage studies have fewer confounding variables than previous orphan studies
Romanian orphanage studies lack data on adult development outcomes
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation proposed that continual presence of mother or mother-substitute is essential for normal psychological development
Separation
Child not being in presence of primary attachment figure
Deprivation
Child becoming deprived of emotional care, which can happen even if mother is present
Theory of maternal deprivation
Proposed by John Bowlby, focused on the idea that the continual presence of care from a mother or mother-substitute is essential for normal psychological development of babies and toddlers, both emotionally and intellectually
Bowlby's monotropic theory of attachment
Bowlby believed that being separated from a mother in early childhood has serious consequences (maternal deprivation)
Bowlby (1953) famously said that 'mother-love in infancy and childhood is as important for mental health as are vitamins and proteins for physical health
Separation
The child not being in the presence of the primary attachment figure
Deprivation
The child becoming deprived of emotional care (which can happen even if a mother is present and, say, depressed)
Brief separations, particularly where the child is with a substitute caregiver who can provide emotional care, are not significant for development but extended separations can lead to deprivation, which by definition causes harm
Critical period
The first two-and-a-half years of life, which Bowlby saw as critical for psychological development
If a child is separated from their mother in the absence of suitable substitute care and so deprived of her emotional care for an extended duration during this critical period then (Bowlby believed) psychological damage was inevitable
Bowlby also believed there was a continuing risk up to the age of five
Intellectual development
Bowlby believed that if children were deprived of maternal care for too long during the critical period they would experience delayed intellectual development, characterised by abnormally low IQ
William Goldfarb (1947) found lower IQ in children who had remained in institutions as opposed to those who were fostered and thus had a higher standard of emotional care
Emotional development
Bowlby identified affectionless psychopathy as the inability to experience guilt or strong emotion towards others, which prevents a person developing fulfilling relationships and is associated with criminality
Bowlby's 44 thieves study
1. Examined the link between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation
2. Interviewed 44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing to assess for signs of affectionless psychopathy
3. Interviewed their families to establish whether the 'thieves' had prolonged early separations from their mothers
4. Compared to a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionally-disturbed young people
Bowlby concluded that prolonged early separation/deprivation caused affectionless psychopathy