Definition - s.1(1) Criminal Attempts Act 1981: If with intent to commit a crime, D does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the final offence
Case of White
AR: s.1(1) D does an act which is more than merely preparatory
Gullefer - Must embark on the crime proper and go past the point of no return
Geddes - D's acts were merely preparation so not an attempt
Jones - D's acts were more than merely preparation so liable (attempted murder)
Boyle v Boyle - D's acts were more than merely preparation so liable (attempted burglary)
MR: Intention to commit the final offence
If the offence has 2 MRs, apply the highest MR - Whybrow: intent to kill ONLY
Recklessness is not enough - Millard v Vernon
Conditional intent is enough for attempted theft
Withdrawl can be used as a defence as long as D has not gone past the preparation stages - Taylor
s.1(2) - Attempting the impossible is never a defence
Physical impossibility
Legal impossibility (Shivpuri)
Inadequate methods
Attempting the impossible can only be a defence if D thinks that what they are doing is illegal, but it actually isn't