Cards (6)

  • Definition - s.1(1) Criminal Attempts Act 1981: If with intent to commit a crime, D does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the final offence
    • Case of White
  • AR: s.1(1) D does an act which is more than merely preparatory
    • Gullefer - Must embark on the crime proper and go past the point of no return
    • Geddes - D's acts were merely preparation so not an attempt
    • Jones - D's acts were more than merely preparation so liable (attempted murder)
    • Boyle v Boyle - D's acts were more than merely preparation so liable (attempted burglary)
  • MR: Intention to commit the final offence
    • If the offence has 2 MRs, apply the highest MR - Whybrow: intent to kill ONLY
    • Recklessness is not enough - Millard v Vernon
    • Conditional intent is enough for attempted theft
  • Withdrawl can be used as a defence as long as D has not gone past the preparation stages - Taylor
  • s.1(2) - Attempting the impossible is never a defence
    • Physical impossibility
    • Legal impossibility (Shivpuri)
    • Inadequate methods
  • Attempting the impossible can only be a defence if D thinks that what they are doing is illegal, but it actually isn't