Deprivation is when a child does not have a lovingattachment figure during their critical period.
Deprivation according to Rutter?
deprivation is when a child forms an attachment to a loving caregiver, which is then broken or removed
Privation according to Rutter?
privation is when a child has never experienced an attachment to a caregiver.
Privation has more serious long-term effects than deprivation
Key study for maternal deprivation?
44 juvenile thieves study
Aim: the 44 juvenile thieves study
To investigate the long term effects of maternal deprivation
Describe cricticism against maternal deprivation theory
Rutter argued there was a distinction between deprivation and privation
Rutter stresses that the quality of attachment bond is the most important factor, rather than just deprivation in the critical period
He argues that it is the disruption of the attachment bond rather than the physical separation
Define maternal deprivation
when a child lacks an attachment figure or is separated from their attachment figure
Outline Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory
Bowlby argued that prolonged emotional deprivation would have serious consequences on a child’s emotional development
Emotional needs are just as important as physical needs, and a warm, intimate and continuous relationship is required for normal mental health
Bowlby claimed that if a child is denied of such care, especially during a critical period of development, they will become emotionally disturbed.
outline the PDD model
the 3 stages children go through when they are deprived from a caregiver:
Protest - become angry about being abandonned by their primary caregiver
Despair - children become sad and withdrawn and refuse to be comforted
Detattachment - children reject their main caregiver when they're reunited with them
Real world application of Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory
In orphanages they have to take account of emotional needs, fostered children have to be kept in one stable home rather than being moved around.
In maternity units, mothers are now allowed to spend more time with their babies as well as if they have a sick child the visiting hours in hospital have been extended
consequences of maternal deprivation
Impaired cognitive development - low IQ & poor language
Impaired emotional development - difficulty controlling emotions and forming relationships with other people
Impaired behavioural development
Case study against Maternal Deprivation Theory
Koluchova (1972) case study on a pair of deprived twins shows support for the idea that the effects of deprivation can be reversed
Koluchova (1972)
twins who were severelyneglected and deprived of an attachment figure, during their criticalperiod
Koluchova (1972)
The twins showed the severe psychological damage that Bowlby claimed they would have
Bowlby claims that this psychological damage would be long-lasting and irreversible
Koluchova (1972)
After being adopted by a loving family and receiving schooling
The twins' cognitive abilities improved leaving them with an above average IQ
The twins went on to form a positive attachment with their caregivers and have happy relationships in adult life
The twins don't support Bowlby's idea that the consequences of deprivation are long-lasting and irreversible
Sample: Bowlby’s 44 thieves
He selected an opportunity sample of 88 children attending his clinic
group 1: thief group - 31 boys and 13 girls were referred to him because of their stealing
group 2: control group - 34 boys and 10 girls were referred because of emotional problems (non-criminals)
Procedure: Bowlby’s 44 thieves
2 groups were matched for age and IQ
The children and their parents were interviewed and tested by a psychiatrist (Bowlby), a psychologist, and a socialworker and focused specifically on their earlylifeexperiences
They established whether the thieves had experienced prolongedseparation from their mother during the criticalperiod and for how long
Findings: Bowlby’s 44 thieves
14 children from the theft group were identified as affectionless psychopaths
12 of those experienced prolongedseparation of more than 6months from their mothers during their criticalperiod
only 5/30 children classified as affectionlesspsychopaths had experienced separation
2/44 in control had experienced prolongedseparation, 0 of them we’re affectionless psychopaths
Conclusions: Bowlby’s 44 thieves
This suggests that the affectionlesspsychopathy may have led to delinquentbehaviour and may be linked to the periods of separation that thieves experienced in earlylife thus supporting the maternal deprivation theory