Assessing standard interviews from police interviews in Florida, observed that witnesses couldn't recall freely, with police leading recall with direct, closed questions
Fisher + Geiselman (1992)
Establishing the Cognitive Interview
Context Reinstallment: mentally return to crime scene, triggers environmental cues
Report Everything: record all details, even if irrelevant
Recall from Changed Perspective: consider perspective of other witnesses to reduce schemas
Recall in Reverse Order: switch chronology to check accuracy of recall and challenge expectations
(+) A03: Fisher
7 Detectives using Cognitive Interview, and 9Detectives using Standard Interview
Found that Cognitive Interview produced 47% more new information, and 67% more total information than Standard Interview
(+) A03: Milne + Bull
Found aspects of Cognitive Interview produced similar amounts of recall, but Context Reinstallment and Report Everything produced the most correct recall, suggesting CI is cumulative
(-) A03: Daily Crimes
Cognitive Interview is not helpful in recognising the suspect, on smaller, daily crimes this isn't useful