Unlawful Act Manslaughter

Cards (17)

  • elements of UAM:
    1. D commits an unlawful act
    2. D has the mens rea of that unlawful act
    3. That act caused the death
    4. The Unlawful Act is objectively dangerous
  • R v Stone and Dobinson [1977]

    Failing to act is not enough for UAM: there must be a voluntary act.
  • R v Franklin [1883]

    A tort is not enough for UAM: the unlawful act must be a crime.
  • R v Lamb [1967]

    All elements of the crime (actus reus and mens rea) must be present.
  • Examples of unlawful acts:
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • ABH
    • Dangerous driving
  • DPP v Newbury and Jones [1976]

    D only needs the mens rea of the unlawful act; they do not need to intend or foresee the risk of death or see the risk of any harm.
  • R v Mitchell [1983]

    Transferred malice could apply.
  • R v Dear [1996]

    Self-neglect is not an intervening act of the victim therefore the chain is not broken and D is guilty.
  • R v Cato [1976]

    D injected V. Consent isn't a defence to manslaughter so there is no break in the chain of causation. D convicted.
  • R v Kennedy (No 2) [2007]

    V, an informed consenting adult, injected himself so the chain of causation is broken. D acquitted.
  • R v Church [1966]

    An act is dangerous if a sober and reasonable person could see it carried a risk of some physical harm.
  • R v Dawson [1985]

    The sober and reasonable person would not know of V's condition and therefore would not consider it dangerous.
  • R v Watson [1989]

    The sober and reasonable person would see V's age and fragility and therefore D’s act was objectively dangerous.
  • R v JM and SM [2013]

    The sober and reasonable person doesn't need to foresee the specific injury that leads to death, only that some physical harm could happen.
  • R v Goodfellow [1986]

    An unlawful act can be aimed at property rather than the V as long as the reasonable person could see a risk of some physical harm arising from it.
  • R v Farnon and Ellis [2014]

    The question of dangerousness is objective. D is compared to the sober and reasonable person even if he is not.
  • Defined in common law as an unlawful act that causes death.