The loss of consumer surplus is the loss to U.S. consumers from the tariff
Total surplus with free international trade
Imports
Consumer surplus
Producer surplus
Gains from free trade
Total surplus is maximized with free international trade
Tariff
$2 tariff is added to the world price, increasing the U.S. price of a T-shirt to $7
Tariff is added
Quantity of T-shirts produced in the U.S. increases, quantity bought decreases
Consumer surplus
Shrinks to the green area
Producer surplus
Expands to the blue area
Area B
Transfer from consumer surplus to producer surplus
Tariff revenue
Equals the imports of T-shirts multiplied by the tariff, area C
Deadweight loss
The sum of the two areas labeled D
Import quota
A quantitative restriction on the import of a good that limits the maximum quantity that may be imported in a given period
Market before import quota
World price is $5
U.S. imports 40 million T-shirts
Import quota of 10 million T-shirts
Supply of T-shirts in the U.S. becomes S + quota, price rises to $7
Higher price
Americans decrease the number of T-shirts they buy to 45 million, U.S. garment makers increase production to 35 million T-shirts, imports decrease to the quota of 10 million
Winners and losers from import quota
U.S. producers of T-shirts gain, U.S. consumers of T-shirts lose, importers of T-shirts gain, U.S. consumers lose more than U.S. producers gain and importers gain
Export subsidy
A payment made by the government to a domestic producer of an exported good
Three traditional arguments for restricting international trade
National security argument
Infant industry argument
Dumping argument
National security argument
A country must protect industries that produce defense equipment and armaments and those on which the defense industries rely
Infant industry argument
It is necessary to protect a new industry from import competition to enable it to grow into a mature industry that can compete in world markets
Dumping
When a foreign firm sells its exports at a lower price than its cost of production, either through predatory pricing or receiving a subsidy
Four newer arguments for protection
Saves jobs
Allows us to compete with cheap foreign labor
Brings diversity and stability
Penalizes lax environmental standards
The idea that buying foreign goods costs domestic jobs is wrong