previous research on the behaviourist perspective which would say that people learn morals through their parents
previous research on psychodynamic perspective which explains morals as a result of the superego
previous research by Piaget's theories on children's thinking developing in stages. he said that in the 1st stage, children cannot see the world from anyone else's point of view but from the age of 8 children begin to understand that morals are more complex and that there are grey areas of right and wrong
Aim
to prove his stages of moral development through interviews
his theory had three levels:
pre-conventionallevel: people are well behaved but only because of the physical consequences to them of being good or bad, if there was no one to judge them, they are likely to misbehave
conventional level: people conform to the social norms and expectations of their family, social group or nation. rules must be followed
post-conventional level: people set their own personal moral principles which may differ from those of their socialgroup
method
longitudinal study
sample
75 American for 12 years
when they started the research they were between 10 and 16 years old
when they finished they were between 22 and 28 years old
Kohlberg repeated this study on boys from Taiwan, Mexico, Malaysia, Canada and the UK
procedure
every boy was presented with hypothetical moral dilemmas every 3 years
these related to 25 different moral concepts
using the answers the boys gave, Kohlberg ranked them in 6 categories (1 being the least morally developed to 6)
this formed his theory of stages moral development
six stages of morality
Obedience/punishment
Self-interest
Conformity to expectations/rules
Authority/social order
Social contract
Universal ethics
conclusion
people's moral development follows an invariant developmental sequence, everyone (regardless of culture, social background or religion) moves through the same 6 stages, but not everyone reaches the last stage