Investigating principles of the sensible, changing nature
Early Greek philosophers first philosophized about Nature or physis, seeking the principles that ruled the physical world and made its processes intelligible
In their concern for the physical, they implicitly oriented their thought toward the metaphysical domain
Term physis signified the fundamental reality and process from which everything originated and in terms of which everything was united i.e. ultimate principle
Oriented toward an explicit scientific elaboration
The first Greek philosophers were not formally metaphysicians like Plato and Aristotle who made explicit distinctions between the spiritual and material and then set forth principles to explain all levels of reality
Transcendent (beyond the appearance of senses) and metaphysical (attained the meta-empirical substrate of reality)
Gave unity of vision and profundity of thought concerning the ultimate meaning of reality
Mathematical enquiry. Pythagoreans were the first Greeks to render the world intelligible in mathematical concepts
They sought the principles of the formal structure of reality in order to achieve a deeper explanation of the unity and order in the world than that provided by the material cause of the Milesians
Their main interest: the ethical problem of leading a good life
Duality between limited and unlimited (odd and even, one and plurality, good and bad)
Mathematical entities (measure, order, proportion etc) are the intrinsic principles of reality
Mathematico-ethical framework: ethical opposites good and evil are determined by opposites limited and unlimited. Good associated with limit i.e. fixity, completeness, harmony. Evil with unlimited
Virtue is a mathematical expression in which the limit principle dominates
Thus, the study of mathematics leads man to the knowledge of a better life
Behind orderly change in universe, there is an all-ruling Logos or Reason to which all things are subject
Logos is the principle of unity. It is the one cause that underlies and includes all the opposites manifested by sensible objects
Reality therefore is unity in plurality and plurality in unity
Because conflict of opposites is essential to things, there is continual tension and a process of becoming, so that "all things are in motion and nothing at rest"
Since being is always what it is or self-identical throughout its entire reality, it is absolutely one, immutable, eternal, homogeneous, continuous and indivisible
Being is absolutely one. Because being alone is, and nonbeing is not, it is absolutely impossible for a plurality of things to exist beyond or within being, which always remain undivided in itself
The proposition "being becomes" is self-contradictory. It implies the origin of being either from nonbeing, that is, from unreality, in which case the being originated would also be unreal, or from being, that is, from what already is, in which case there would be no real becoming. As both alternatives are unacceptable, being suffers no change
Indirectly defended the Parmenides' unity of being by refuting the possibility of plurality
Because of his skill in argument and because he began formally the method of reasoning from hypothetically assumed premises to contradictory conclusions, he is called the discoverer of dialectic
Reconciliation of being and becoming, unity and plurality
Their general theme: there is a plurality of existing beings which in themselves are unified and unchangeable, but which by addition of motion and combinations achieve change and variety
They returned to physical investigation, but not purely as that of the Milesians since they retained metaphysical concepts derived from Heraclitus and especially Parmenides
First to develop a physical theory; fire, air, earth and water as four roots of all things, each real in the sense of being
Like being, these elements are eternal, homogeneous and unchangeable but unlike it they are divisible and moves locally
Compliance with Parmenides' theory that nonexistence has no place in any account of reality, the four beings by occupying the whole of space leave no room in the universe for the void
Motion is possible through displacement of parts of matter that crowd and displace each other
Hence his theory reconciles Milesian idea of primal source of all becoming and Parmenides' concept of being
The principles of motion are love and strife
The corruption of one thing and the coming into existence of another is in reality the dissolution of one temporary combination of these indestructible roots by the power of strife, and the establishment of another combination by the activity of love; there is no becoming or perishing of being
Moral significance of his theory of nature: the cosmic forces of love and strife also govern the destiny of the soul, with love accounting for good and strife for evil
He divided being into an infinite number of 'seeds', infinitely divisible and small and like Parmenides' being, eternal, unchangeable and homogeneous
These simple principles were called by Aristotle 'homoeomers' (like things) because, however far they are divided they always separate into parts qualitatively the same as their wholes
He reified Parmenides world of appearances by endowing it with being now concretized as seeds
He envisioned a supreme physical principle transcending and unifying all beings and all becoming. This was the being of beings, the being behind all becoming—Mind
For the first time there was a sharp dualism between Mind and other things
Mind became a distinct, independent physical cause on which the whole construction of the world was based
The atom is a purely physical unit, one and impenetrable
The indivisibility of the atom derives from its absolute compactness, continuity and smallness
By virtue of its indivisibility the atom is a Parmenidean being in miniature. As such it is that which really and always is; it is eternal and unchangeable, because it is a complete or limited whole; it is solid and without void, thus admitting no coming-to-be or ceasing to-be by an intrinsic union or separation of parts
Absolute values as opposed to the Sophists' relativism
Socrates: religious, moral and political human experiences are founded on nature (physis) and are constant, for example, the soul and the good
Knowledge is search for the universal; beyond individual experiences there are common realities such as goodness and justice which are universally true
Among universal concepts there are moral constants such as justice and piety which are valid and beneficial for all men
Sophists: religious, moral and political human experiences are founded on convention (nomos) and are relative
Truth dependent on individual perceiver therefore is no more than personal opinion
Moral values are relative to each man or state and are products of convention which are man-made
He cared about the improvement of the soul; perfection of the soul is the key to philosophy
Human soul: divine element which makes man like the gods, and is the seat of intellectual and moral powers that can govern man and know what is true and good. Hence to serve the soul—the throne of the highest human values—is to serve God
Socratic method: 1. examination; 2. exhortation (advice). "The unexamined life is not worth living"
Process: from negative (scientific doubt out of intellectual humility) to positive (elicit from the other a confession of ignorance which is the beginning of wisdom)
He conceived the Good as perfective of the soul's powers, both rational and moral
Three basic propositions of the spiritual life: 1. Virtue is knowledge. Man is morally good only to the extent that he possesses a true intellectual knowledge of good and its manifestations. The wise man knows and does what is right
2. No one does wrong intentionally. 'Intentionally' implying both knowledge and will. One who is clouded by mere opinion and motivated by desire for apparent goods does not deliberately act wrongly
3. He conceived true virtue as indivisible. A man who possesses virtue as a whole enjoys in some part all its necessary manifestations, e.g. Justice and piety
In 399 B.C. he was brought to trial by the leaders. The charges were: i) impious service of divinities different from the gods of the state; ii) scandalous corruption of the youth