Content analysis validity

    Cards (2)

    • Face validity
      > The quickest most superficial way of assessing for validity
      > This involves an independent psychologist in the same field seeing if a coding category looks like it is measuring what it claims to measure at first sight
      > If they say yes the content analysis is valid
    • Concurrent validity
      > A way of assessing validity by comparing the results of a new content analysis with the results from another similar pre-existing content analysis which has already been established for its validity
      > If the results are similar we can assume the test is valid
      > The correlation of two sets of coding recordings gained from appropriate stats test should exceed +0.8