The idea of what 21st Century life should consist of - essentials (such as access to clean water and electricity), access to services and opportunities
Indicators
Different ways to measure development
Types of indicators
Economic indicators
Social indicators
Environmental indicators
GDP
A measure of wealth and mean wealth through income
GDP per capita
A measure of wealth and mean wealth through income. A high GDP per capita could represent a high-earning population and productive workforce, but GDP per capita could be skewed by very rich minorities, even if the majority of the population earn very little
Poverty Line
The number of people earning less than $1.90 per day
Economic Inequality
The difference in wealth between the richest 10% and poorest 10% of the population. The larger the inequality, the less wealth is shared across the population and the fewer who benefit from the economy
Life Expectancy
Measuring lifestyles and health. Life expectancy is an estimate of how long a person will live, made when they're born, based on predicted advances, current services and the risk of diseases
Literacy Rate
Quality of education which correlates to economic output. A well-educated workforce tends to earn higher wages
Infant Mortality Rate
Quality of healthcare and attitudes towards children. Infant mortality is important since infants are some of the most vulnerable people of society, so are more likely to catch disease and infection or suffer from malnutrition
Pollution Levels
The volume of pollution in the air and water will show how wasteful a country is. It also shows whether a country has developed its technology to become more efficient and less polluting
Area of Woodland/ Green Space
The more open land a country has, the more pleasant it is to live there. The proportion of woodland lost or gained can reflect the government's attitude to the environment
Developments through technology have changed the way we measure development
We have also learnt that development can be interpreted differently for different societies; some countries value particular factors more than other countries do
Using different measures and indices can result in countries ranked differently for development
Human Development Index
A measure that takes into account income & inequality, levels of education, and life expectancy
Top 5 Countries on HDI
Norway (0.953)
Switzerland (0.944)
Australia (0.939)
Ireland (0.938)
Germany (0.936)
Bottom 5 Countries on HDI
Niger (0.354)
Central African Republic (0.367)
South Sudan (0.388)
Chad (0.404)
Burundi (0.417)
Reasons for trends in top 5 HDI countries
Large economies and advancing technology (quaternary) industries, resulting in a high GDP per capita
Well structured cities and towns, with strong infrastructure and transport links, excellent supplies of clean water, electricity and food to households
Free education systems, with opportunities to progress onto further education (universities) or into employment & apprenticeships
Rostow's Modernisation Theory
1. Traditional Society
2. Pre-conditions for Take Off
3. Take Off
4. Drive to Maturity
5. High Mass Consumption
The Brandt Line divides developing and developed countries into their groups
On the whole, the northern hemisphere is more developed than the southern hemisphere
Social Causes of Inequality
Education - Education is important to the development and economy of a country. If someone doesn't have the right qualifications, they might not be able to get a well-paid, dependable job. This can lead to increased unemployment or large poverty, as families struggle to pay their bills
Health - A limited number of doctors or unsubsidised healthcare (treatments aren't paid for by the government) might lead to low-income families having a poorer health
Historically Disadvantaged - Countries that have been ruled in the past by another country can be disadvantaged. For example, countries that were part of the British Empire have smaller economies than the UK's economy
Frank's Dependency Model
The core tends to become richer, whilst the periphery remains poor and low development
There are many countries that Britain took advantage of during the British Empire (17th - 20th century) including many Caribbean countries as well as some African nations
Frank's Dependency Model
Model that shows how different areas trade resources and goods in a cycle
Selling goods makes more profit than selling resources, so even though the arrows look the same size, trading isn't fair for all countries involved
Core
Tends to become richer
Periphery
Remains poor and low development
Different countries
The Carribean and Britain (during the Empire)
Capital city and rural villages within a country, such as in China
Britain took advantage of many Caribbean countries as well as some African nations during the British Empire, allowing Britain to develop ahead of its colonies
The development gap between Britain and its colonies is still present today
Climate
Affects whether a country has many resources to trade
Affects whether a country has regular rainfall, which is good for health and can be sold
Affects whether a country can grow crops well
Affects whether a country suffers from droughts and soil erosion
Affects whether a country can grow crops throughout the year
Topography
Affects where communities can live and build
Affects whether a country is landlocked or has access to the sea, which impacts trade and fishing
Capitalist governments
Tend to be in the most developed countries
Communist governments
Tend to be in less developed countries
Inequality
Greater for capitalist governments
International relations
Countries with more allies have more opportunities to trade and earn profit, and can receive aid from allies
Corruption
Includes governments forcing themselves in power, police and government receiving bribes, and money going missing, especially aid