the process of acquiring knowledge and understanding, the process happens throughout our lives through formal and informal education
meritocratic system
you are rewarded for how hard you try and effort you put in
myth of meritocracy
you don't get what you deserve even if you have worked hard
social mobility
able to move up and down the social ladder of life
social cohesion
idea that schools are meant to teach you how to like other people and not discriminate them based on race, age, gender, social class
hidden curriculum
the learning that takes place outside of lessons in day to day school life
hierarchy
shape of a pyramid, each later is smaller than the other - decrease in power
in a school head teacher at the top and students at the bottom
hierarchy in school reflect hierarchal structure of society
competition
schools encourage competition between students
eg. exam results
society is also based on competition
social control
the hidden curriculum of rules, regulations, obedience and respect for authority
it is one mechanism of control that reflects those social control of Britain in society at large
gender role allocation
subject choice and gender in school and gender role allocation in the wider society
job segregation begins at school
lack of satisfaction
critics of school claim that much or the school day is taken up with boring and meaningless activities
durkheim (1858 - 1917)
durkheim saw the teaching of history as a key part of the socialisation process. people learnt to feel part of something bigger than themselves (part of a community), this helps to encourage children to understand that society is important
schools prepare us for the wider society where we have to co operate with people too wouldn't be with
Durkheim believed that in modern society where different people need to be able to do different jobs people need to have specialist skills
criticisms of durkheim
feminists argue that the culture being transmitted is patriarchal and male dominated
they say it encourages traditional gender roles where girls/women are subordinated
not all students may accept the norms and values being transmitted
bowles and gintis
education creates and then reproduces an obedient, submissive, disciplined and hard working workforce for capitalists
they are effectively 'trained' not to question bad decisions
studied 237 new york high school students - schools rewarded obedient and disciplined students
they concluded that schools produce an unimaginative and unquestioning workforce
correspondence principle
link between the relationships and interactions expected values in school and those that are expected
schools mirror the workplace
the myth of meritocracy
we are just led to believe that it treats people fairly/equally
this prevents people from questioning the system
criticisms of bowles and gintis
they assume that students have no free will
many students reject the values of schools
modern economies now require a flexible and creative workforce
butler education act 1944
aimed to improve society and the economy through a better education system --- led to the tripartite system
aim of the butler act was for students to have an equal chance to improve their talents in a system of free education
pros of the tripartite system
support available for different abilities
meritocratic
cons of the tripartite system
reflected social class background as more privileged children would have better access to education and cultural capital outside of the classroom
therefore more ready for the 11+ exam
1965 comprehensive act
middle class and working class students went to the same schoo
pros of the comprehensive act
everyone went to the same local school
cons of comprehensive act
continued to reproduce class inequalities due to streaming and labelling
education reform act 1988
make the education system more business like
national curriculum
all schools in england and wales had to do the same subjects
assessments were effected e.g SATs GCSEs
produced greater equality in terms of subject choice
privileged/skilled choosers
generally middle class
they sent their kids to schools that they want
semi-skilled choosers
mixed class group
more open to the media reports and judgment of other school s
disconnected choosers
less able to make choices
usually made their selections on geography or on the current 'happiness' of the child rather than in terms of job prospects
criticisms of ball bowe and gerwitz
less academically able students were neglected
some schools introduced streaming and setting and this focused on higher sets
made schools unequal
aims of new labour
wanted to raise standards in schools
too many failing schools, without the right qualifications
educational equality
gave nursery kids free school meals
raising standards (NL)
introduction of academies
education maintenance allowance - disadvantaged students get a weekly allowance for attending college
gifted and talented programme
aim higher programme
sure start programme
pre school education
children under 5
could be nurseries, playgroups, nursery schools
primary education
infant and junior schools
from age 5-11
most is provided by the state, although there are some private, fee paying primary schools
secondary education
from ages 11-16
provided by the state
private fee paying grammar and independent faith schools are also available
further and higher education
eduction beyond compulsory age
the independent sector
private schools
they don't have to follow the same rules as state schools
should education be provided by the state or by the independent sector
yes:
the schools are usually local
state schools are free
morally right
no:
lower teacher:student ratio
exam results are significantly higher than national average
vocational education and training
skills linked to specific jobs
this trend has been developing since 1970, but is still sometimes known as the 'new vocationalism'
for vocational education
lead to skilled better qualified workforce
students who aren't as academic have the chance to excel in other areas