Why did Charles refuse to consider Parliament's settlements seriously?
He wanted to play on the divisions between the English Parliament, the Scots, and the New Model Army.
1646: two Parliamentary factions developed - the Political Presbyterians and the Political Independents
Political Presbyterians
Key Figures: Denzil Holles and Phillip Stapleton
More moderate - 'Peace Party'
Opposed to religious toleration
Favoured a negotiated peace with the king and were willing to accept settlement on minimal terms (incl. disbanding New Model Army).
Increasingly disenchanted with the New Model Army
Drew closer to the Scots
Supported the Presbyterian Church to prevent social revolution
Political Independents
Key Figures: Oliver Cromwell and Henry Ireton
More radical - 'War Party'
Disliked the authoritarianism of Scottish Presbyterianism
Wanted a considerable measure of religious toleration
Allied with New Model Army, as the army was seen as security against Charles
Willing to settle with king and disband NMA only if Charles accepted limitations to his power.
1646: Political Presbyterians were the most influential group in Parliament because most of the country would have preferred their peace policy.
What was the Newcastle Propositions (July 1646)?
The Presbyterian plan for settlement
What were the main features of the Newcastle Propositions?
religion: Charles was to accept the establishment of Presbyterianism in England for three years.
militia: Parliament was to control militia (the armed forces) for 20 years - likely the remainder of Charles’ life.
Parliament: The Triennial Act was to remain, guaranteeing regular parliaments as a limit on the power of the monarch.
Royalists: Only 58 Royalists were not pardoned —> hopefully encouraging others to accept defeat.
What was Charles' response to the Newcastle Propositions?
Stalled because he wanted to take advantage of the divisions growing in Parliament; settlement was hampered by religious differences.
What did the Political Presbyterians add to their revised Newcastle Propositions?
demobilising the New Model Army but keeping a smaller force to go to Ireland to crush the Irish Catholics
creating an alternative ‘safe’ army based on the London Trained Bands
What was the 'Declaration of Dislike'?
Holles criticised the New Model Army - called them the ‘enemies to the state and disturbers of the peace’
What caused the politicisation of the New Model Army?
The Newcastle Propositions and Holles’ ‘Declaration of Dislike’
Main motivations of the NMA
Their wages were £3 million in arrears. They faced disbandment before this money was paid.
There was the possibility of being charged with offensives committed during the war, as Parliament had no passed an indemnity act (protection against actions taking during the civil war).
March 1647: NMA petitioned Parliament for redress of their grievances. Parliament condemned the petition.
May 1647: the Commons accepted Charles’ 3rd reply to the Newcastle Propositions; NMA antagonised (think it’s too lenient); Commons vote to disband NMA with only 8 weeks’ arrears of pay.
June 1647: NMA held a general meeting at Newmarket —> formed the General Council of the Army, a more formal political structure
2nd June 1647: Charles was seized by the army —> their control of him was what really made them a significant force in the politics of settlement.
4th June 1647: Army produces the ‘Humble Remonstrance’ - declaring they will not disband until their grievances were met (incl. indemnity act and removal of Presbyterian faction)
5th June 1647: The document ‘Solemn Engagement’, detailing the army’s position, was presented to Parliament.
14th June 1647: ‘A Representation of the Army’ (mainly written by Ireton and John Lambert, aided by Cromwell. Declared the army was ‘not a mere mercenary army’.
What the 'A Representation of the Army' outline?
a purge of Parliament
future Parliaments of a fixed duration
guaranteed right of freedom of the people to petition Parliament
an extension of religious freedom
What was the Heads of the Proposals?
The army’s own settlement plan, drafted by Ireton and Lambert (published 2nd August 1647)
What were the main points of the Heads of the Proposals?
regular biennial parliaments
reform of parliamentary representation
parliamentary control of the army and navy
parliamentary appointment of great offices of state for ten years
religious settlement that maintained the national Church with bishops, but no coercive power
Act of Oblivion (pardon) that exempted only a few Royalists from punishment
What caused division in the army during the search for settlement?
Ireton and Cromwell showing their desire for a moderate settlement in compromising with Charles
When did Charles escape Hampton Court?
November 1647
What were the Four Bills?
Sent to Charles by Parliament whilst he was still imprisoned; it was an amalgamation of Parliament’s Newcastle Propositions and the army’s Heads.
What was the Engagement (Dec 1647)?
Charles met with a faction of the Covenanters who were disappointed with their alliance with the English Parliament
Charles agreed that England would have a three-year period of Presbyterianism in return for the Scots’ help in invading England against Parliament
When did Parliament pass the Vote of No Addresses?
January 1648
Windsor Prayer Meeting (April 1648)
New Model Army gathered at Windsor to pray before facing their enemies; declared Charles I was the ‘man of blood’
July 1648: a large troop of Scottish forces entered England to join 4000 northern Royalists.
October 1648: Cromwell and Lambert went to Edinburgh to ensure that the anti-Engagers in Scotland led by Argyll were securely in power.