Researcher looks to manipulate independent variable to see if it will cause a change in dependent variable (causes a change in behaviour)
Uses factors that can be measured, manipulated and quantified
Lab experiments
All variables apart from the independent variable are controlled > measure effects of independent variable on dependent variable > establishing cause and effect relationships
positivists argue it's possible to create similar research situation to a scientific lab, in a controlled environment where all variables can be monitored
Two groups in an experiment:
Experimental group (independent variable) = group who have something changed
Control group (dependent variable) group who stay the same
Leads to cause and effect relationship being established, used to prevent/predict future events
Example of Lab experiment: Bandura
Conducted lab research investigating effects on children of watching violent media, providing conclusive results
showed children a film of a man hitting a doll >children were led into different rooms where they're told different messages about the man's behaviour > children introduced to doll
children had neither been told the behaviour was good or bad, they displayed more aggression to the doll
Strengths of lab experiments
Researcher has control over the experiment, allows effects to be precisely measured
Receive quantitative data and replicate research
Allows researchers to eliminate effects of extraneous variables - undesirable variables which are not of interest might interfere with results of experiment
Example of lab experiment: Milgram
Interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person
Learner - strapped to an electric chair, teacher tests by naming a word, learner recalls (aware it's an experiment)
Teacher - administers electric shock every time learner makes mistake, increases level each time (unaware that electric shocks were fake)
People tend to take orders if they recognise their authority as morally right, likely to follow orders even to extent of killing
Stanford prison experiment, Zimbardo
Examine whether people would conform to social roles of prison guard/prisoner when in a mock prison environment
all male uni students who volunteered and were selected on the basis of their physical and mental stability
both guards and prisoners quickly identified with social roles - guards were violent and dehumanizing and prisoners become increasingly submissive
experiment meant to run for 2 weeks but stopped due to extreme mental torment
Field experiments - interpretivists
Take place in real social setting, those involved often unaware
Example of field experiment, Rosenthal and Jacobson
Wanted to find out effects of labelling in classroom
Students given test, teacher said 20% of random students were going to 'spurt' the following year
Teachers' expectations (independent variable) increased for 20%
Students re-did test, 20% randomly picked spurted
Strengths of field experiments
Real life setting, better external validity, can show hidden meanings of everyday social interactions
Large scale settings
Weaknesses of field experiments
Not possible to control variables comapred to lab
If people know they're being studied they may change their behaviour accordingly (Hawthorne Effect)
Subjects aren't aware they're taking part, no consent
Disadvantages of Rosenthal and Jacobson experiment
Lack of informed consent, had to deceive teachers so they didn't know
80% of group didn't benefit, teacher gave disproportionate amounts of attention to 20%
Not possible to rule out role of extraneous variables, didn't conduct observations of teacher expectations leading to higher achievement
Criticisms of Bandura's experiment
Lack's validity - strange situation exposed to unusual adult behaviour and given toys to play with, encouraged them to act unnaturally
Children may have been distressed by aggressive behaviour, behaviour learned may have stayed with them, causes behavioural problems
Disadvantages with Milgram's experiment
Lacks validity - tested obedience in a lab, different to real-life situations of obedience, can't generalise findings to real life situations of obedience
Deceiving was necessary however it caused emotional distress to those unware, lack of informed consent
Disadvantages of Zimbardo's study
Many participants were mentally distressed and immediate action wasn't taken, lack of informed consent
Lacks validity - student guards lacked professional training, unable to compare to a real prison setting