peer review = the evaluation of research work of a psychologist carried out by other research psychologists
three purposes of peer reviews:
publication of research
allocation of funding
assessing the research rating of university departments
process of conducting a peer review:
researcher submits article to journal
article is assessed by editor
if accepted, article is sent to reviewers
reviewers submits comments to the editor
editor can reject article or return it to make changes
then it is published
strengths of peer review:
can establish the validity of research before publishing
ensures confidence in published work
confidentiality of peer reviews allow honesty and objectiveness
limitations of peer reviews:
slow and expensive
may be difficult to find experts
anonymity allows them to discredit research without detection
still open to bias as its highly subjective
format of psychological investigations:
abstract
introduction
method
results
discussion
abstract = provide a summary of the research and covers the aims and hypothesis which is less than 200 words
introduction = provides background on relevant theories and studies to explain how aims and hypothesis developed
method = is a researcher wishes to replicate the research then its a guide. it is broken into 5 sections - sample, procedures , equipment , ethics and design
result = to present the overall summary of the findings - descriptive statistics , inferential statistics
discussion= discuss the findings and suggest possible uses and future areas of research - summary , comparison , limitations and modifications , implications and application