The feminist movement since the 1960s has challenged the traditional stereotype of a woman's role
Girls' magazines
In the 1970s, emphasised the importance of marriage and not being 'left on the shelf'
Today, women are seen as more assertive and independent
McRobbie's research on girls' magazines can be criticised for being an out-dated view since it is over 20 years old
Forms and the power of the media have changed considerably in the past two decades
It is unclear whether these changes have had a much greater influence on young girls' attitudes
Changes in the family since the 1970s
Increase in the divorce rate
Increase in cohabitation and a decrease in the number of first marriages
Increase in number of lone-parent families
Smaller families
Strengths of changes in the family
Increased numbers of female-headed lone-parent families may mean more women need to take on a breadwinner role, creating a new adult role model for girls - an independent woman
There have been important changes in women's employment in recent decades
The Equal Pay Act (1970) makes it illegal to pay women less than men for work of equal value
The Sex Discrimination Act (1975) prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace
The number of women in employment went up from 53% in 1971 to 67% in 2013
The New Right claim that a decline in the nuclear family has resulted in many boys developing an anti-school subculture which results in poor educational achievement
Sharpe (1994) found a major shift in how girls see their future
In 1974, girls had low aspirations believing that educational success was unfeminine and that appearing ambitious would be unattractive
Now, girls have higher career aspirations and so need educational qualifications
The changes encouraged by feminism may affect girls' self-image and ambitions with regard to family and careers, resulting in educational achievement
There are class differences in how far girls' ambitions have changed
Policymakers are now much more aware of gender issues and teachers are more sensitive to the need to avoid stereotyping
Jo Boaler (1998) sees the impact of equal opportunities policies as a key reason for changes in girls' achievement
Many of the barriers have been removed and schooling has become more meritocratic (based on equal opportunities) - so that girls, who generally work harder than boys, achieve more
Initiatives to encourage girls into non-traditional workplaces
GIST (Girls Into Science and Technology)
WISE (Women Into Science and Engineering)
The introduction of the National Curriculum in 1988 removed one source of gender inequality by making girls and boys study mostly the same subjects
There has been an increase in the proportion of female teachers and heads
Stephen Gorard (2005) found that the gender gap in achievement increased sharply in the year when GCSE was introduced, bringing with it coursework as a major part of nearly all subjects
He concludes that the gender gap in achievement is a "product of the changed system of assessment rather than any more general failing of boys"
Girls in schools are encouraged to be neat, tidy and patient, and these qualities become an advantage in today's assessment system, helping girls achieve greater success than boys
Research in the 1970s and 80s found that learning materials portrayed women in stereotypical ways
Gaby Weiner (1995) argues that since the 1980s, teachers have challenged such stereotypes and sexist images have been removed from learning materials
This may have helped to raise girls' achievement by presenting them with more positive images of what women can do
Roger Slee (1998) argues that boys are less attractive to schools because they are more likely to suffer from behavioural difficulties and are four times more likely to be excluded
Resulting in boys being 'liability' students
Louise Archer uses the concept of 'symbolic capital' to understand the conflict between working-class girls' feminine identities and the values and ethos of the school
Performing their working-class feminine identities gave the girls symbolic capital from their peers, but brought them into conflict with the school's middle-class values
Archer found that working-class girls invested time and money in constructing 'desirable' and 'glamorous' hyper-heterosexual, feminine identities
This brought them status among their peers but also led to them being punished by the school for having the 'wrong' appearance
Evans found that 'successful' working-class girls wanted to go to university to increase their earning power, but also to help with their families' income
The 'caring' aspect of their working-class feminine identity produced a desire to live at home with their families while studying, leading to their self-exclusion from elite universities further away
External factors contributing to boys' underachievement
Boys' poorer literacy skills
Decline of traditional men's jobs
Internal factors contributing to boys' underachievement
Feminisation of education
Shortage of male primary school teachers
'Laddish subcultures'
The government has introduced initiatives like the Raising Boys Achievement project and the Dad's and Sons campaign to help address boys' literacy issues
Since the 1980s, there has been a significant decline in heavy industries, contributing to the decline of traditional men's jobs
Underachievement of boys
Lack of literary knowledge
The gender gap is mainly the result of boys' poorer literacy and language skills
Reason for boys' poorer literacy and language skills
Parents spend less time reading to their sons
Reason for boys' poorer literacy and language skills
Mothers who do most of the reading to young children, who thus come to see reading as a feminine identity
Reason for boys' poorer literacy and language skills
Boys' leisure pursuits, such as football, do little to help develop their language and communication skills
Contrast with girls
Girls tend to have a 'bedroom culture' centred around staying in and talking to friends
Poor literacy and language skills are likely to affect boys' performance across a wide range of subjects
Government initiatives to help with boys' underachievement
1. The Raising Boys Achievement project: involves a range of teaching strategies, including single-sex teaching
2. The Dad's and Sons campaign encourages fathers to be more involved with their son's education