1. The necessity for individual projects, newly proposed as well as works –in-progress should be fully examined from the point of view of the relevance of the project to the expansion or improvement of the network, the essentiality of the specific project and its profitability
2. Works-in-progress may turn out to be not relevant and therefore not justifying further expenditure due to prolonged gestation of the projects or recent developments like policy decisions regarding changing technology, such as digitalization, change in Product-mix from factories, like phasing out of electro-mechanical system
3. Decision should be taken in such cases regarding abandoning of the project, taking care to find ways and means of salvaging the investment already made
4. In case of projects which have been included in the Demand-for-grants after the above scrutiny, the listing may be done on the basis of priority, so that the directorate could decide about any possible deletion in the context of inadequacy of allotment of funds
5. In the case of works costing less than Rs.5 Cr each, where a lump sum allotment is asked for, a similar exercise, as mentioned above should be under taken so that only essential and remunerative projects are included in the programme