Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: misleading information including leading questions, post-event discussion and anxiety. Improving the accuracy of eyewitness testimony including the use of the cognitive interview
Loftus and Palmer's second study showed that leading questions don't just give a biased answer from the witness, they actually change their memory of the event
When there is more than one witness to an event, they may discuss what they have seen with each other, or with other people that weren't there, which may influence the accuracy of each witnesses' recall of the event
Johnson & Scott found that 49% of participants from the low anxiety condition were able to correctly identify the man compared to only 33% from the high anxiety condition
Milne and Bull found that using a combination of 'report everything' and 'mental reinstatement' significantly increased recall compared to a normal interview