Seeks to describe the current status of an identified variable. Describes existing conditions, behaviors, and characteristics. Systematically collecting/gathering data without manipulating any existing variables. The researchers are in no part of this design, only the research itself. Purely describes the characteristics of a data. Addresses: what, who, where, and when questions
Involves identifying and measuring relationships between two or more variables without manipulating them. When there's a change in one thing accompanied by a change of another thing. Variables cannot be controlled whether may it be about ethical, logical, or practical reasons. Does HAVE limitations. Correlation does not equate causation
Often called true experimentation, uses the scientific method to establish the cause-effect relationship among a group of variables that make up a study. The true experiment is often thought of as a laboratory study, but this is not always the case; a laboratory setting has nothing to do with it. A true experiment is any study where an effort is made to identify and impose control over all other variables except one. An independent variable is manipulated to determine the effects on the dependent variables
Used to investigate causal relationships when the researcher cannot (or doesn't want to) randomly assign participants (whether for practical and ethical reasons). Relies on groups or pre-existing groups to form groups for comparison. It's more difficult to confidently establish causality between variables. Less control over other variables that may impact findings. Uses great statistical power; pays attention to any confounding variables (outside variable)
Explores the meaning of lived experiences and how they are perceived by individuals. Seeks to understand people's perspectives, emotions, and behaviors in specific situations. The aim of the researchers is to uncover the essence of human experience without making any assumptions or imposing preconceived ideas on their subjects. Uses: in-depth interviews and open-ended questionnaires. Includes involvement of: interviewing families and parents, talking to kids, and looking for patterns in a message
Aims to develop theories by continuously analyzing and comparing collected data from a relatively large number of participants. Uses inductive reasoning as an approach with the focus of letting the data speak for itself without being influenced by pre-existing theories or the researchers preconceptions. Can be time intensive as it requires repetitive approach. Goal is to directly derive a theory from the data that was collected in order to have a deeper understanding of the context
Involves observing and studying a culture-sharing group of people in their natural setting to gain insight into their behaviours, beliefs, and values. Observing participants in their natural environment as opposed to a controlled or artificial environment. Aside from interviews, this also revolves around the belief of exploring participants' views, beliefs, etc.. Enables the generation of rich, contextually embedded insights into the socio-cultural dynamics of human behaviour
Involves investigating a single individual (or a single grouo of individuals) to gain an in-depth understanding of their experiences, behaviours, or outcomes. A deep-dive into specific circumstances revolving around a person, a group of people, event, or phenomenon within a context. Includes: interviewing staff and management, surveying customers, and reviewing documents
Each member of the population has an equal and known chance of being selected
When there are very large populations, it is often 'difficult' to identify every member of the population, so the pool of available subjects becomes biased
A special nonprobability method used when the desired sample characteristic is rare
Relies on referrals from initial subjects to generate additional subjects
Lowers search costs but introduces bias because the technique itself reduces the likelihood that the sample will represent a good cross section from the population